Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences 37.1 pp 19-43
© The Physiological Society 1952
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Burgh Daly, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hebb, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Burgh Daly, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hebb, C.

PULMONARY VASOMOTOR FIBRES IN THE CERVICAL VAGOSYMPATHETIC NERVE OF THE DOG

I. de Burgh Daly 1 and Catherine Hebb 1

1 The Department of Physiology, University of Edinburgh, and the Agricultural Research Council, Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge

In perfused lung preparations under conditions which exclude passive effects due to bronchomotor responses:

1. Electrical stimulation of the separated cervical vagus or cervical sympathetic gives rise to pulmonary vasomotor responses. The vagosympathetic contains preganglionic fibres, some of which have their cell stations in the middle cervical ganglion. Others are postganglionic.

2. Electrical stimulation or the application of nicotine to the superior cervical ganglion or the nodose ganglion causes pulmonary vasomotor responses.

3. In atropinized perfused preparations the response to cervical vagosympathetic stimulation is predominantly pulmonary vasopressor, in non-atropinized preparations predominantly vasodepressor.

Note:

We wish to express our thanks to Miss Josephine Weatherall and Miss Helen Duke for help in some of the experiments, and to the Moray Fund Committee for a grant in aid of the research. Thanks are also due to Mr. George E. Moseley for technical assistance, and to Mr. A. Marshall for carrying out certain histological investigations.

Submitted on November 12, 1951







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1952 by the The Physiological Society.