Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences 41.1 pp 85-96
© The Physiological Society 1956
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, L. J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, L. J. P.

THE INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST

L. J. P. Duncan 1

1 The Department of Therapeutics, University of Edinburgh

1. Two indices of glucose tolerance, the "total index" and the "increment index", derived from an intravenous glucose tolerance test have been defined, and determined in, 20 normal and 15 diabetic subjects.

2. The "total index" is based on the assumption that the rate of fall of blood glucose remains consistently proportional to the total blood glucose value. The "increment index" assumes that the rate remains proportional to the increment blood glucose value.

3. The mean "total index" for 42 tests in 20 normal individuals was 1·37 and the mean "increment index" was 3·68.

4. The mean "total index" for 21 tests in 15 mildly diabetic patients was 0·71 and the mean "increment index" was 1·83.

5. With a constant loading dose of glucose both indices are reproducible in any one individual.

6. Increasing the loading dose from 25 to 50 g. produced significant increases of the "total index" in 8 normal and 6 diabetic subjects. The "increment index" remained constant in both groups.

7. As the "increment index" is reproducible in any one individual within a twofold variation in the dose of glucose injected, it is the preferable measure of glucose tolerance.

Note:

My thanks are due to Professor D. M. Dunlop for his constant encouragement, and to Dr. C. P. Stewart and Dr. T. W. G. Kinnear for their help in the preparation of this paper.

This work was carried out during the tenure of the William Goodall Gibson Fellowship of the University of Edinburgh.

Submitted on July 20, 1955







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1956 by the The Physiological Society.