Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences 48.4 pp 328-345
© The Physiological Society 1963
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, T. D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, T. D. M.

RHYTHMIC EXCITATION OF A STRETCH REFLEX, REVEALING (a) HYSTERESIS AND (b) A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE RESPONSES TO PULLING AND TO STRETCHING

T. D. M. Roberts 1

1 Institute of Physiology, University of Glasgow

When sinusoidally fluctuating tensions were applied to the soleus muscle of a decerebrate cat, plots of tension against length showed a hysteresis loop, implying damping. Various tensions and frequencies of oscillation were used, with and without simultaneous head-tilting or inhibition of the stretch reflex. The damping was not frequency-dependent (i.e. not viscous or due to velocity feedback). The pattern of the loops for overlapping ranges of tension indicated a "distributed simple friction" mechanism. The way the loops shifted during change of gamma bias indicated that the damping was located in the series-elastic elements. During imposed length-changes the response curve shifted sporadically along the tension axis and sudden twitch-like increases in tension occurred in an unpredictable fashion. In contrast, the responses to tension-changes were more consistent. This difference was most marked when other reflex effects were simultaneously elicited, e.g. by head-tilting. The effects are accounted for by defining the stretch reflex as "a reflex increase in the stiffness (dgrT/dgrL) of a muscle in response to increased tension on its spindles". The sequence of changes in the "clasp-knife" response can also be explained in this way.

Note:

I am indebted to Dr. P. B. C. Matthews for valuable discussions and for access to unpublished material; also to colleagues who have commented on drafts of this paper. The work was supported in part by the Rankin Fund of the University of Glasgow.

Submitted on January 29, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the The Physiological Society.