Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 67.1 pp 69-79
© The Physiological Society 1982
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ali, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlet, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ali, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlet, A. L.

INHIBITION OF MONOAMINE OXIDASE IN CHICKENS AND DUCKLINGS BY A MICROBIAL METABOLITE OF FURAZOLIDONE

B. H. Ali 1 and A. L. Bartlet 1

1 Department of Veterinary Pharmacology, University of Edinburgh, EH9 1QH

In the chicken, monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity in the brain, heart and alimentary tract was inhibited when furazolidone was given at the therapeutic dose (0·04%, w/w, in the feed for 10 days). The inhibition of MAO activity was most marked in the rectal caeca and least in the liver, where no inhibition was found. Furazolidone treatment, probably in consequence of MAO inhibition, increased the amount of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the brain and potentiated the vasopressor action of tyramine. The amounts of adrenaline and noradrenaline in the brain were unaffected by the treatment, as was the vasopressor action of noradrenaline. Furazolidone (0·04%, w/w, in the feed, 10 days) inhibited MAO activity in the liver of ducklings but not chickens, indicating that hepatic clearance of the inhibitor was less efficient in the former species than in the latter. In other organs from the treated birds no species difference was apparent in the degree of MAO inhibition, and the effect of the treatment on the amounts of 5-HT, adrenaline and noradrenaline in the brain was similar in chickens and ducklings. Neomycin antagonized the furazolidone acting as a MAO inhibitor in chickens and ducklings, following administration of the drugs by crop tube. This observation suggests that in these birds the alimentary microflora transformed furazolidone to an active metabolite which subsequently inhibited MAO activity in other organs. Although furazolidone is considered highly toxic in the duck, in the present experiments ducklings survived when it was given in the feed at a concentration of 0·04% (w/w) for 10 days or by crop tube at a dose of 200 mg/kg. It is suggested that the husbandry of the duck affects its susceptibility to furazolidone.

Submitted on February 26, 1981







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the The Physiological Society.