Experimental Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 69.1 pp 133-143
© The Physiological Society 1984
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yesberg, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cross, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yesberg, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cross, R. B.

CONVERTING-ENZYME INHIBITION AND 1-SARCOSINE-8-ISOLEUCINE-ANGIOTENSIN II: EFFECTS ON RENAL FUNCTION IN THE DEHYDRATED SHEEP

Nancy E. Yesberg 1, Myrna Henderson 1, Catherine Dallemagne 1, Sandra Law 1, D. Hamilton 1, and R. B. Cross 1

1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia 4067

The effect of a converting-enzyme inhibitor (captopril) was studied in nine conscious dehydrated Merino ewes. Captopril (4 mg I.V. over 40 min) caused significant decreases in mean arterial blood pressure (M.A.B.P.), renal vascular resistance (R.V.R.) and filtration fraction, and increases in urine flow (V), sodium excretion, glomerular filtration rate (G.F.R.), renal plasma flow, solute clearance (Cosm), solute-free water reabsorption (TC,H2O) and plasma renin activity (P.R.A.). None of these effects was observed when captopril was similarly administered to sheep pretreated with angiotensin II (AII) receptor blocker, l-sarcosine-8-isoleucine-AII (sarileucin). It is concluded that the effects of captopril were probably not due to bradykinin potentiation but rather to decreased levels of circulating AII. The effect of sarileucin itself was complex. It effectively blocked the pressor response to administered AII, but it also had an AII-like effect indicated by a rise in R.V.R., and decreases in V, G.F.R., Cosm and TC,H2O. This apparent mixture of All agonist and antagonist properties probably accounts for the absence of any change in M.A.B.P. or P.R.A. during sarileucin administration.

Submitted on June 20, 1983







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the The Physiological Society.