Experimental Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 71.2 pp 307-327
© The Physiological Society 1986
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, I. A.

TWO TYPES OF STATIC ggr-AXON IN CAT MUSCLE SPINDLES

I. A. Boyd 1

1 Institute of Physiology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ

The action of single static ggr-axons in ‘single fibre’ ventral root filaments was tested on the responses of from two to eight spindles in the same tenuissimus muscle in anaesthetized cats. The type of intrafusal fibre activated in each spindle by a particular axon was diagnosed from its effect on the discharge of primary and secondary sensory endings, frequently in the same spindle. One or two spindles were subsequently isolated in most experiments and the type of intrafusal fibre activated by the axon was observed directly. Except in the case of a few weak actions which could not be interpreted, the diagnosis made from the afferent recordings was always correct. Twenty-four static ggr-axons activated the chain fibres in every spindle they supplied on which their action was tested; the static bag2 fibre was also involved in about 20% of the spindles though its contraction was quite often weak. Eleven static ggr-axons activated the static bag2 fibre in every spindle they supplied on which their action was tested; some chain fibres were activated as well in about 20% of the spindles. There were only two possible exceptions to the general rule that a static ggr-axon activates either the chain fibres or the static bag2 fibre in every spindle it supplies and never activates only the chain fibres in one spindle, and only the static bag2 fibre in another spindle. Direct observation of isolated spindles provided preliminary evidence that some non-selective connexions of static ggr-axons have a pronounced physiological action by way of their terminals on one type of intrafusal fibre while the terminal(s) on the other type of fibre produce such a weak contraction that the sensory endings are not affected. Other non-selective connexions do, however, have a significant physiological effect by way of their terminals on both the static bag2 fibre and the chain fibres. It is proposed that there are two types of static ggr-motoneurone. ‘Static bag ggr-motoneurones’, through their terminals on the static bag2 fibre in every spindle, bias the discharge from primary endings (and to a lesser extent from some secondary endings) but leave their length sensitivity largely unaltered; connexions to chain fibres in some spindles have a weak action on primary endings but may greatly increase the length sensitivity of secondary endings. ‘Static chain ggr-moto-neurones’, through their terminals on chain fibres in every spindle, drive the discharge of primary endings in such a way that, if several axons are activated together, the sensitivity of the primary endings to changes in muscle length may be abolished; connexions to the static bag2 fibre in a few spindles seem to enhance this effect. Static chain ggr-motoneurones probably bias the discharge of secondary endings substantially but have a variable action on their length sensitivity.

Submitted on July 9, 1985




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. P. Mileusnic, I. E. Brown, N. Lan, and G. E. Loeb
Mathematical Models of Proprioceptors. I. Control and Transduction in the Muscle Spindle
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1772 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. S. Schafer, B. Berkelmann, and F. Dadfar
Magnitude of Oscillations in the Response of Ia Muscle Spindle Endings Under a Static gamma Stimulation of Increasing Frequency
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1748 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Emonet-Denand, Y. Laporte, and J. Petit
Comparison of the Effects of Stimulating Groups of Static {gamma} Axons With Different Conduction Velocity Ranges on Cat Spindles
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 533 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Petit, R. W. Banks, and Y. Laporte
Testing the Classification of Static gamma  Axons Using Different Patterns of Random Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2823 - 2832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Taylor, P. H. Ellaway, and R. Durbaba
Physiological Signs of the Activation of Bag2 and Chain Intrafusal Muscle Fibers of Gastrocnemius Muscle Spindles in the Cat
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 130 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Emonet-Denand, Y. Laporte, and J. Petit
Comparison of Static Fusimotor Innervation in Cat Peroneus Tertius and Longus Muscles
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the The Physiological Society.