Experimental Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 73.2 pp 163-173
© The Physiological Society 1988
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekström, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tobin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ekström, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tobin, G.

NON-ADRENERGIC, NON-CHOLINERGIC SALIVARY SECRETION IN THE FERRET

J. Ekström 1, B. MÅnsson 1, L. Olgart 1, and G. Tobin 1

1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics and Department of Endodontics, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden

Secretion of parotid and submandibular saliva evoked by electrical stimulation of the parasympathetic nerves occurred in the presence of adrenergic and cholinergic blocking agents. The ‘atropine-resistant’ response amounted to about 30% in the submandibular gland and to about 5% in the parotid gland as compared to the response before administration of antimuscarinic agents. The ‘atropine-resistant’ secretion was found at relatively high frequencies, and the latency between the start of the stimulation and the onset of secretion was long. Upon long-lasting stimulation the ‘atropine-resistant’ secretion decreased rapidly and markedly. The tachykinins substance P (SP) and substance K, injected i.v., evoked flow of saliva from both glands. Given singly, exogenous vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) caused no salivary flow. However, it enhanced the tachykinin-evoked secretory response. The response to SP was also enhanced when i.v. injections of this peptide were combined with nerve stimulation, even at subthreshold frequencies for secretion, in the presence of the autonomic receptor blockers. Both tachykinins and VIP are putative transmitters involved in mediating the ‘atropine-resistant’ secretory response.

Submitted on June 17, 1987
Accepted on August 17, 1987







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the The Physiological Society.