Experimental Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 74.1 pp 1-6
© The Physiological Society 1989
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Izraely, H.
Right arrow Articles by Demment, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Izraely, H.
Right arrow Articles by Demment, M. W.

FACTORS DETERMINING THE DIGESTIVE EFFICIENCY OF THE DOMESTICATED DONKEY (EQUUS ASINUS ASINUS)

H. Izraely 1, I. Choshniak 1, A. Shkolnik 1, C. E. Stevens 2, and M. W. Demment 3

1 Department of Zoology, The George S. Wise Center for Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel
2 School of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
3 Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Factors determining the digestive efficiency of donkeys were studied in animals fed either a low quality roughage (wheat straw: 77·1% neutral detergent fibre, 2·8% crude protein) or a high quality forage (alfalfa hay: 47·5% neutral detergent fibre, 22·7% crude protein). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) intake when fed wheat straw was 1693 ± 268 g animal-1 day-1, 10% higher than when fed alfalfa hay. Digestive coefficient of NDF and acid detergent fibre (ADF) when fed wheat straw amounted to 50·9 ± 4·9 and 42·0 ± 4·1% respectively. NDF and ADF apparent digestibilities and mean retention times (37·7 ± 1·7 and 36·4 ± 3·2 h respectively) were not significantly different (P rang 0·05) between the two diets. The donkey appears to digest cell wall constituents as efficiently as the Bedouin goat when on low quality roughage, but less efficiently when fed alfalfa hay. Its energy digestibility is, however, as high as that reported for the Bedouin goat. The donkey's high energy digestibility is related to its capacity to digest soluble food components more efficiently than the ruminant. The mean retention time in the donkey is shorter than in the Bedouin goat and is consistent with its capacity to compensate for a lower quality diet by increasing its intake rate. Recycling of urea in donkeys maintained on wheat straw amounted to 75·5 ± 13·0% of the entry rate. A decrease in the rate of renal urea filtration, coupled with an increase in the fraction reabsorbed, increased the retention of nitrogenous waste and permitted recycling of nitrogen into the gut.

Submitted on April 12, 1988
Accepted on July 20, 1988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. C. Sneddon, E. Boomker, and C. V. Howard
Mucosal surface area and fermentation activity in the hind gut of hydrated and chronically dehydrated working donkeys
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 119 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
C. E. STEVENS and I. D. HUME
Contributions of Microbes in Vertebrate Gastrointestinal Tract to Production and Conservation of Nutrients
Physiol Rev, April 1, 1998; 78(2): 393 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the The Physiological Society.