Experimental Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 75.3 pp 339-348
© The Physiological Society 1990
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blair-West,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wright, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blair-West, , JR
Experimental Physiology, Vol 75, Issue 3, 339-348
Copyright © 1990 by The Physiological Society


Article

The effects of K+ channel blockers on ovine parotid secretion depend on the mode of stimulation

RD Wright and Blair-West JR

The vascularly isolated parotid glands of sheep were submaximally stimulated for 4 min by nerve stimulation, or by infusion of acetylcholine (ACh) or bethanechol directly into the artery supplying the gland. The three modes of stimulation caused almost equal increases in the rate of salivary flow, initial losses of K+ and phosphate from the gland and total glandular deficits of K+ and phosphate. Concurrent arterial infusion of the K+ channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA), at 1.5-3.3 mM in blood, almost abolished these responses to bethanechol but did not alter the responses to nerve stimulation or ACh. The responses to bethanechol were restored by increasing the concentration fourfold. Concurrent arterial infusion of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), at 0.1-2.3 mM in blood, partially inhibited the increase in salivary flow due to bethanechol but not the response to nerve stimulation or ACh. The specificity and competitive nature of the action of TEA and 4-AP on responses to direct muscarinic stimulation by bethanechol are consistent with blockade of K+ channels in secretory end-piece cells. The failure of TEA and 4-AP to inhibit responses to nerve stimulation and ACh may be due to the blocking agents potentiating the release of neurotransmitter ACh. It is also possible that nerve stimulation and ACh may cause the release of a co-transmitter which bethanechol does not.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
T. Takahata, M. Hayashi, and T. Ishikawa
SK4/IK1-like channels mediate TEA-insensitive, Ca2+-activated K+ currents in bovine parotid acinar cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): C127 - C144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the The Physiological Society.