Experimental Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 83.3 pp 281-292
© The Physiological Society 1998
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katz, P.
Experimental Physiology, Vol 83, Issue 3, 281-292
Copyright © 1998 by The Physiological Society


Article

Comparison of extrinsic and intrinsic neuromodulation in two central pattern generator circuits in invertebrates

PS Katz

There are many sources of modulatory input to CPGs and other types of neuronal circuits. These inputs can change the properties of cells and synapses and dramatically alter the production of motor patterns. Sometimes this enables the production of motor patterns by the circuit. At other times, the modulation allows alternate motor patterns to be produced by a single circuit. Modulatory neurones have fast as well as slow actions. In some cases, such as with GPR, the two types of effects are due to the release of co-transmitters. In other cases, such as with the DSIs, a single substance can act at different receptors to cause fast and slow postsynaptic actions. The effect of a neuromodulatory neurone is determined by the type of receptor on the target neurone. Thus a single modulatory neurone evokes a suite of actions in a circuit and thereby produces a co-ordinated output. Extrinsic and intrinsic sources of neuromodulation have different sets of constraints acting upon them. For example, extrinsic neuromodulation can easily be used for motor pattern selection; a different pattern is produced depending upon which modulatory inputs are active. However, intrinsic neuromodulation is not well suited to that task. Instead, it is useful for self-organizing properties and experience-dependent effects. One clear conclusion from this work and other work in the field is that neuromodulation by neurones intrinsic and extrinsic to CPGs is not uncommon (Katz, 1995; Katz & Frost, 1996). It is part of the normal process of motor pattern generation. As such, it needs to be considered when discussing mechanisms for neuronal circuit actions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. P. Lieske and J.-M. Ramirez
Pattern-Specific Synaptic Mechanisms in a Multifunctional Network. II. Intrinsic Modulation by Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1334 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Diaz-Rios and M. W. Miller
Rapid Dopaminergic Signaling by Interneurons That Contain Markers for Catecholamines and GABA in the Feeding Circuitry of Aplysia
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2142 - 2156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Svensson, S. Grillner, and D. Parker
Synaptically Evoked Membrane Potential Oscillations Induced by Substance P in Lamprey Motor Neurons
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Thoby-Brisson and J.-M. Ramirez
Identification of Two Types of Inspiratory Pacemaker Neurons in the Isolated Respiratory Neural Network of Mice
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 104 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the The Physiological Society.