The abdominal circulation contains a high proportion of the total blood volume and this can change either passively in response to changes in vascular distending pressure or actively (termed a capacitance response) to changes in sympathetic nervous activity. The liver is the largest abdominal organ and this study was designed to evaluate its potential contribution to overall vascular capacitance and compliance. In chloralose anaesthetized dogs, the liver was vascularly isolated, perfused through the portal vein and hepatic artery at either constant pressures or constant flows and drained from the hepatic veins at constant pressure. Changes in vascular resistance were assessed from changes in inflow pressures or flows and hepatic blood volume was determined by differences between net inflow and outflow. During constant flow perfusion the change in hepatic volume (capacitance change) in response to supramaximal stimulation of sympathetic nerves at 16 Hz was (mean +/- S.E.M.) -2.40 +/- 0.61 ml (kg body weight)-1. This response was not significantly different during constant pressure perfusion. The changes in portal venous and hepatic arterial pressures during stimulation at constant flow perfusion were +0.67 +/- 0.13 and +4.92 +/- 0.67 kPa, respectively. The compliance of the liver, assessed as the change in volume to a change in hepatic venous pressure, was +5.44 +/- 0.18 ml kg-1 kPa-1. These results indicate that the liver has a major capacitance role, comparable to that of the canine spleen and, in addition, is highly compliant. No evidence was found to suggest that a sphincter on the hepatic outflow exists. Assuming similar responses occur in humans, who do not possess a large contractile spleen, the liver would be the most important controllable blood reservoir in the body.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. F. Rothe Point-Counterpoint: Active venoconstriction is/is not important in maintaining or raising end-diastolic volume and stroke volume during exercise and orthostasis J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1262 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]