Experimental Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 83.5 pp 639-649
© The Physiological Society 1998
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dobashi, Y
Right arrow Articles by Wakui, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dobashi, Y
Right arrow Articles by Wakui, M
Experimental Physiology, Vol 83, Issue 5, 639-649
Copyright © 1998 by The Physiological Society


Article

Regulation of spontaneous rhythmic contractions in rat pregnant myometrium by corticotrophin-releasing factor

Y Dobashi, T Kanno, S Suga, Y Saito, and M Wakui

To elucidate the role of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) in the spontaneous rhythmic contractions of pregnant myometrium, isometric contractions of longitudinal myometrial preparations taken from Sprague-Dawley rats (18-21 days gestation) were measured. CRF (0.03-30 nM) significantly increased the amplitude (117 +/- 4% of control at 30 nM, mean +/- S.E.M.) and significantly decreased the frequency (74 +/- 5%) in a concentration-dependent manner. The area under the tension curve did not increase (89 +/- 8%). Such effects of CRF were not observed in preparations pretreated with the RP diastereomer of adenosine cyclic 3',5'-phosphorothioate (Rp-cAMPS, 10 microM), an inhibitor of protein kinase A. In preparations pretreated with indomethacin (1 microM), CRF caused little change in the amplitude but significantly decreased the frequency of the contractions. Intracellular cAMP levels in the preparations, measured by enzyme immunoassay, rose when CRF was applied at 30 nM. These results suggest that the slight positive inotropic action of CRF is due to activation of both cAMP and prostaglandin pathways, whereas the negative chronotropic action is due solely to the cAMP signalling pathway.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the The Physiological Society.