Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 90.1 pp 27-31
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2004.028126
© The Physiological Society 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/1/27    most recent
expphysiol.2004.028126v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nicklin, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nicklin, S. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Symposia Papers

Symposium Report

Viral gene transfer in neuroscience: new tricks of the trade

Cell-selective viral gene delivery vectors for the vasculature

Andrew H. Baker1, Angelika Kritz1, Lorraine M. Work1 and Stuart A. Nicklin1

1 British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Church Street, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK

Abstract

Clinical gene therapy for cardiovascular disease remains achievable. To date, however, preclinical studies and clinical trials have highlighted shortfalls in viral gene delivery to vascular cells. These include poor efficiency, poor target tissue selectivity, the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies and immunogenicity generated by the host to vectors such as adenovirus. These important issues require careful consideration when applying viral vectors for gene therapy. Each delivery vector requires precise optimization and tailoring for each disease application since parameters relating to vector : tissue exposure time, route of delivery and target cell type vary considerably. Optimization can be achieved through modification of the structure of the virus capsid proteins and expression cassette to generate vectors that are highly selective and efficient for target cell binding and entry as well as instilling transcriptional control and/or longevity on transgene expression. This ultimately will improve the efficacy and toxicity profiles of gene delivery vectors and has become a very important area in gene therapy. Here, we review recent advances in the targeting of viral gene delivery vectors to the vasculature.

(Received 19 August 2004; accepted after revision 15 October 2004; first published online 12 November 2004)
Corresponding author Andrew H. Baker, British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Church Street, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK. Email: ab11f{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. R. Makela, H. Matilainen, D. J. White, E. Ruoslahti, and C. Oker-Blom
Enhanced baculovirus-mediated transduction of human cancer cells by tumor-homing peptides.
J. Virol., July 1, 2006; 80(13): 6603 - 6611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
G Murphy and M H Lee
What are the roles of metalloproteinases in cartilage and bone damage?
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2005; 64(suppl_4): iv44 - iv47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the The Physiological Society.