Experimental Physiology
	

Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 91.4 pp 765-771
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.033357
© The Physiological Society 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/4/765    most recent
expphysiol.2006.033357v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogelsang, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Volianitis, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogelsang, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Volianitis, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular control

The plasma atrial natriuretic peptide response to arm and leg exercise in humans: effect of posture

T. W. Vogelsang1, C. C. Yoshiga1, M. Højgaard1, A. Kjær2,3, J. Warberg3, N. H. Secher1 and S. Volianitis1,4

1 The Copenhagen Muscle Research Centre, Departments of Anaesthesia, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark2 The Copenhagen Muscle Research Centre, Departments of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark 3 Department of Medical Physiology, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 4 School of Sport and Education, Brunel University, Middlesex, UK

During arm exercise (A), mean arterial pressure (MAP) is higher than during leg exercise (L). We evaluated the effect of central blood volume on the MAP response to exercise by determining plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) during moderate upright and supine A, L and combined arm and leg exercise (A + L) in 11 male subjects. In the upright position, MAP was higher during A than at rest (102 ± 6 versus 89 ± 6 mmHg; mean ± S.D.) and during L (95 ± 7 mmHg; P < 0.05), but similar to that during A + L (100 ± 6 mmHg). There was no significant change in plasma ANP during A, while plasma ANP was higher during L and A + L (42.7 ± 12.2 and 43.3 ± 17.1 pg ml–1, respectively) than at rest (34.6 ± 14.3 pg ml–1, P < 0.001). In the supine position, MAP was also higher during A than at rest (100 ± 7 versus 86 ± 5 mmHg) and during L (92 ± 5 mmHg; P < 0.01) but similar to that during A + L (102 ± 6 mmHg). During supine A, plasma ANP was higher than at rest and during L but lower than during A + L (73.1 ± 22.5 versus 47.2 ± 15.9, 67.4 ± 18.3 and 78.1 ± 25.0 pg ml–1, respectively; P < 0.05). Thus, upright A was the exercise mode that did not enhance plasma ANP, suggesting that central blood volume did not increase. The results suggest that the similar blood pressure response to A and to A + L may relate to the enhanced central blood volume following the addition of leg to arm exercise.

(Received 27 January 2006; accepted after revision 27 April 2006; first published online 4 May 2006)
Corresponding author S. Volianitis: Department of Anaesthesia, AN 2041, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, 2100 Denmark. Email: stefanos.volianitis{at}excite.com







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the The Physiological Society.