|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received November 26, 2007
Revised January 9, 2008
Accepted after revision March 27, 2008
Cardiovascular Control [210] |
1 The Ohio State University
2 Oxford University
3 University of Oxford
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: billman.1{at}osu.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
from 611 ± 24
, n = 16) when compared to intact controls (+43 ± 5
from 620 ± 20
, n = 7). Acute vagotomy during ischemia abruptly increased HR (from 155 ± 11 bpm to 193 ± 15 bpm) and MEI (+12 ± 1.1
, from 663 ± 18
). In contrast, VNS during ischemia (n = 11) abruptly reduced HR (from 206 ± 6 to 73 ± 9 bpm) and MEI (-16 ± 2
, from 700 ± 44
). These effects of VNS were eliminated by pacing but not by bilateral stellectomy. VNS during CAO also attenuated ECG-derived indices of ischemia (e.g., ST-segment: 0.22 ± 0.03 vs. 0.15 ± 0.03 mV) and of rate-corrected repolarization dispersion (TPEc: 84.5 ± 4.2 vs. 65.8 ± 5.9 ms, QTc: 340 ± 8 vs. 254 ± 16 ms). VNS during myocardial ischemia exerts negative chronotropic effects, limiting early ischemic electrotonic uncoupling and dispersion of repolarization, possibly via a decreased myocardial metabolic demand.
Key Words: Cardiac arrhythmia, Ischaemia, Vagus
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |