Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 91.1 pp 111-119
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.031666
© The Physiological Society 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/1/111    most recent
expphysiol.2005.031666v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koba, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koba, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Themed Issue papers
Right arrow Cardiovascular control

Themed Issue Papers

Renal sympathetic and circulatory responses to activation of the exercise pressor reflex in rats

Satoshi Koba1, Takayoshi Yoshida1,2 and Naoyuki Hayashi3

1 Graduate School of Engineering Science2 School of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan 3 Institute of Health Science, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We investigated the role played by the exercise pressor reflex in sympathetic regulation of the renal circulation in rats. In mid-collicular decerebrate rats, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), left renal cortical blood flow (RCBF) and left renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) were recorded before and during 30 s of static contraction of the left triceps surae muscles evoked by electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve, which activates both metabo- and mechanosensitive muscle afferents, and during 30 s of passive stretch of the left Achilles tendon, which selectively activates mechanosensitive muscle afferents. Static contraction (n = 17, +344 ± 34 g developed tension) significantly (P < 0.05) increased MAP (+14 ± 3 mmHg), HR (+6 ± 1 beats min–1) and RSNA (n = 11, +19 ± 5%) and significantly decreased renal cortical vascular conductance (RCVC, n = 11, –11 ± 2%). Passive stretch (n = 20, +378 ± 11 g) also significantly increased MAP (+11 ± 2 mmHg), HR (+7 ± 2 beats min–1) and RSNA (n = 15, +14 ± 4%) and significantly decreased RCVC (n = 11, –12 ± 3%). RCBF showed no significant changes during static contraction or passive stretch. Renal denervation abolished the decrease in RCVC during contraction (n = 12) or stretch (n = 13). These data indicate that both the exercise pressor reflex and its mechanically sensitive component, the muscle mechanoreflex, induced renal cortical vasoconstriction through sympathetic activation in rats.

(Received 27 July 2005; accepted after revision 4 October 2005; first published online 6 October 2005)
Corresponding author N. Hayashi: Institute of Health Science, Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga-Kouen, Kasuga, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan. Email: naohayashi{at}ihs.kyushu-u.ac.jp


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Three principal neural inputs to the brainstem, namely central command, the exercise pressor reflex (EPR) and the reflex from peripheral baroreceptors, have been proposed to regulate the cardiovascular system during exercise. Central command is a feedforward mechanism that stimulates locomotion and activates cardiovascular centres within the brainstem (Waldrop et al. 1996). The EPR is a feedback neural drive that originates from metabolic and mechanical activation of free nerve endings located in contracting skeletal muscles (Kaufman & Forster, 1996). Signals from the nerve endings project to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord via group III and IV skeletal muscle afferent fibres (Kaufman et al. 1983; Kaufman & Forster, 1996), and then to the brainstem (Bauer et al. 1990; Iwamoto & Waldrop, 1996; Li et al. 1998; Toney & Mifflin, 2000). The EPR comprises the chemically sensitive muscle metaboreflex and the mechanically sensitive muscle mechanoreflex (Kaufman & Forster, 1996). Cardiovascular responses to exercise brought about by the engagement of central command and the EPR are modulated in part by the baroreflex (Ogoh et al. 2002; Potts & Mitchell, 1998).

Recent studies have demonstrated that the function of the EPR is altered in heart failure, contributing to the abnormal cardiovascular response to exercise in rats (Li et al. 2004; Smith et al. 2003, 2005), dogs (Hammond et al. 2000) and humans (Middlekauff et al. 2004; Momen et al. 2004). The advantages of using rats are: (1) that the mechanically and metabolically sensitive components of the EPR can be isolated; (2) that the EPR can be stimulated in the absence of input from central command; (3) that cellular and molecular techniques not available in larger animals and humans are readily available; and (4) that models of human disease are readily available. However, this species had been little used in studies of the EPR till recently. This is because of the previous conflicting data in anaesthetized rats, in which activation of the EPR has been shown to elicit both a pressor (Ishide et al. 2002) and depressor response (Smith et al. 2001; Hayashi, 2003; Plowey & Waldrop, 2004) or no response at all (Vissing et al. 1991). These discrepancies could be due to an unknown effect of anaesthesia in this species (Smith et al. 2001; Hayashi, 2003). Smith et al. (2001) and Hayashi (2003) established a non-anaesthetized and decerebrated rat model and reported that the activation of the EPR by static muscle contraction increased blood pressure in this model (Smith et al. 2001; Hayashi, 2003), which is consistent with the data obtained in other species (Coote et al. 1971; McCloskey & Mitchell, 1972; Victor et al. 1988; Matsukawa et al. 1992; Wilson et al. 1994; Potts & Mitchell, 1998; Kramer & Waldrop, 2001). However, to date there have been no studies determining the sympathetic response to activation of the EPR in this model. Moreover, the role played by the sympathetic nervous system in regulation of the peripheral circulation has not been clarified. Thus, determination of the sympathetic and circulatory responses to activation of the EPR in the decerebrate rat model should provide information that can be used to improve our understanding of circulatory control during exercise in both health and disease.

In the present study, the decerebrate rat model was used to investigate renal sympathetic and circulatory responses mediated by the EPR. We focused on the kidneys because these organs receive about 20% of the cardiac output in resting humans (Rowell, 1986). In anaesthetized cats, it was reported that EPR increases renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) and induces renal vasoconstriction (Victor et al. 1988; Matsukawa et al. 1992). We examined renal sympathetic and circulatory responses to static contraction of the triceps surae muscles in the decerebrate rat model described by Hayashi (2003). We also examined these responses to passive stretch of the muscles. Static contraction activates the EPR (both the muscle metabo- and mechanoreflexes), whereas passive stretch activates only mechanically sensitive muscle components of the EPR (Kaufman et al. 1983; Stebbins et al. 1988; Victor et al. 1988; Kaufman & Forster, 1996). In addition, renal circulatory responses were compared before and after renal denervation to assess the role of renal innervation.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
General

All experimental procedures were approved by the Research Ethic Committee of School of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University, and were conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals in the Fields of Physiological Sciences published by the Physiological Society of Japan. Male Sprague–Dawley rats (7–9 weeks old, weighing 250–350 g) were anaesthetized by inhalation of a mixture of halothane (< 4%) and oxygen. The trachea was cannulated, and the lungs were artificially ventilated with a ventilator (SN-480-7, Shinano, Tokyo, Japan). The left jugular vein and common carotid artery were cannulated for administration of drugs and recording of arterial blood pressure (AP), respectively. The carotid catheter was attached to a pressure transducer (P23XL-1, Ohmeda, Madison, WI, USA). Arterial pH was measured at 30 min intervals with a pH meter (B-212, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan), and was maintained within normal limits by infusing sodium bicarbonate solution (1M) intravenously or by changing the artificial ventilation minute volume. Needle electrodes were positioned on the back to record electrocardiogram (ECG). The ECG signal was amplified with a differential amplifier (AB-621G, Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). Heart rate (HR) was calculated beat to beat by detecting the time between successive R waves in the ECG. Body temperature was maintained adequately with a heating lamp. The rat was placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (ST-7, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan).

To record RSNA, the left kidney was exposed retroperitoneally through a left flank incision. The bundle of the renal nerve fibres was carefully dissected from other connective tissues. A piece of laboratory film was placed under the isolated bundle, and two tips of a bipolar electrode were placed between the nerve bundle and the film. The nerve bundle and the electrode tips were embedded in silicon gel. Once the gel had hardened, the silicon rubber was fixed to the surrounding tissue with a glue containing {alpha}-cyanoacrylate. The third tip of the electrode, which served as an earth electrode, was attached to the adipose tissue near the nerve. A pool was formed around the nerve with laboratory film and filled with mineral oil. RSNA was confirmed by observing the decrease and increase in response to intravenous injection of phenylephrine (5 µg) and nitroprusside (5 µg), respectively. The RSNA signal was amplified with a differential amplifier (MEG2100, Nihon Kohden) with a band-pass filter of 150 Hz in low-cut frequency and of 1 kHz in high-cut frequency, and made audible. The left renal cortical blood flow (RCBF) was recorded with a laser-Doppler flowmetry with a needle-type probe (ALF21, Advance, Tokyo, Japan), which measures blood flow within a radius of 1 mm from the tip of the probe. The probe was placed and stabilized vertically on the dorsal surface of the kidney.

The left triceps surae muscles were isolated, and the left Achilles tendon was isolated by cutting the calcaneus bone. The left peroneal nerve was cut from the sciatic nerve. The common tibial nerve was carefully dissected and then placed on a shielded bipolar electrode connected to a stimulator (SEN-7203, Nihon Kohden) with an isolator (SS-202 J, Nihon Kohden). The electrode was stabilized with silicon gel, and the surgical opening was filled with warm mineral oil. The tension generated by the triceps surae muscles was recorded with a force transducer (TB-611T, Nihon Kohden) connected to the Achilles tendon. The hindlimb was fixed in space with a patellar precision clamp to prevent limb movement.

Decerebration at the mid-collicular level was performed according to the method described by Hayashi (2003). Dexamethasone (0.2 mg) was administered intravenously to minimize oedema. Immediately before decerebration, the right carotid artery was occluded permanently to reduce bleeding in the brain. The upper skull and dura matter were removed, and then cerebral tissue was removed by aspiration. The brain was then sectioned vertically with a blade at the mid-collicular level. All neural tissues rostral to the section as well as the cerebral tissues covering the cerebellum were aspirated. Small pieces of cotton gauze were set in the cranial vault to control bleeding, after which the halothane anaesthesia was withdrawn. The cranial vault was filled with agar. To replace the blood lost during decerebration (approximately < 1 ml), saline was given intravenously in an amount sufficient to maintain basal AP. Before the experiments, a recovery period of 90 min was allowed to eliminate the effects of anaesthesia and to stabilize the preparation.

Experimental protocols

The rat was stabilized in sternal recumbency. Before experimental protocols, the motor threshold (MT), which is the minimum current intensity necessary to evoke twitching of the triceps surae muscles, was determined by electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve with a pulse duration of 30 µs. The muscles were stretched to create a baseline tension of 30–50 g. After collecting 30 s of baseline data, static contraction of the triceps surae muscles for 30 s was evoked by electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve (30 Hz, 30 µs pulse duration, 2 x MT) in the spontaneously breathing decerebrate rat. This stimulation intensity did not activate the tibial afferents directly, since no response occurred during stimulation in the paralysed (vecuronium bromide, 0.03 mg kg–1) and artificially ventilated rat (Hayashi, 2003). Passive stretch of triceps surae muscles for 30 s was also evoked by mechanically stretching the left Achilles tendon at the same tension as the static contraction. In cases in which contraction or stretch made the rat move reflexively, the data were discarded.

To separate neural and non-neural components of the RCBF response to static contraction or passive stretch, the protocols were also performed in renal denervated (RD) rats. Left renal denervation was performed by cutting all nerves that could be visualized. In cases in which rats used in the control (CON) trial were also used in the RD trial, the animals were re-anaesthetized with a mixture of halothane (1%) and oxygen. After renal denervation, a recovery period of 90 min was allowed.

At the end of data collection, the left tibial nerve was cut distal to the electrode and electrically stimulated to ensure that the observed responses to static contraction were not due to direct stimulation of muscle afferents. In cases in which this stimulation increased AP, the data were discarded.

After all protocols, the rat was killed with an intravenous anaesthetic overdose (pentobarbitone sodium, 100 mg kg–1), and the background noise of RSNA and artifacts of RCBF were recorded.

Data acquisition and statistical analyses

AP, ECG, HR, RSNA, RCBF and tension generated by the triceps surae muscles were displayed continuously on a computer monitor and stored on hard disk by analog-to-digital conversion (Powerlab/8s, AD Instruments, Sydney Australia) at a sampling rate of 1 kHz. AP and HR were recorded in all rats (n = 33). The reflex responses to static contraction before renal denervation were investigated in 17 CON rats. RCBF was recorded in six rats, RSNA in six rats, and both RCBF and RSNA were recorded in five of these rats. The reflex circulatory responses to static contraction after renal denervation were investigated in 12 RD rats. Three of these rats were used for the RD protocol after the CON trial. The reflex responses to passive stretch before renal denervation were investigated in 20 CON rats. RCBF was recorded in five rats, RSNA in nine, and both RCBF and RSNA were recorded in six of these rats. The reflex circulatory responses to passive stretch after renal denervation were investigated in 13 RD rats. Four of these rats were used for the RD protocol after the CON trial. The reason why there is a discrepancy in the numbers of rats used is because some of the data were discarded if: (1) there was a vital change in the rat during the measurements; (2) muscle stimulation evoked spontaneous motor activity; or (3) electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve increased AP after cutting the nerve distal to the electrode.

Electrical artifacts of RCBF, which were less than 5% of the recorded RCBF at baseline, were subtracted from the recorded RCBF. Mean AP (MAP), HR and RCBF were calculated beat by beat and then averaged over every 1 s. The returned absolute value of the recorded RSNA was integrated by 1 s and subtracted by the 1 s integrated background noise. In RSNA and RCBF, the recorded absolute valude at steady state varied among rats. To quantify the RSNA and RCBF responses to contraction or stretch, relative changes from baseline were determined by taking the means of the values during the prestimulation period for 30 s. These values were considered to be 100% of baseline. Renal cortical vascular conductance (RCVC) was obtained by dividing RCBF by MAP, and the relative changes from baseline were quantified in the same way as for RSNA and RCBF.

The data are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Basal MAP and HR were determined by analysing 30 s of data immediately before the onset of the muscle stimulation. The baseline data between trials were compared by Student's unpaired t test. The reflex responses to static contraction or passive stretch were analysed statistically by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), to evaluate the effects of the muscle stimulation on the differences between the responses and baseline, and to evaluate the effects of renal denervation on the responses during contraction or stretch. Where significant F ratios were found by the ANOVA, post hoc analysis was performed with Tukey's procedure. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Basal MAP and HR before static contraction were, respectively, 86 ± 6 mmHg and 348 ± 10 beats min–1 in the CON rats, and 72 ± 6 mmHg and 350 ± 18 beats min–1 in the RD rats. Basal MAP and HR before passive stretch were, respectively, 76 ± 4 mmHg and 325 ± 11 beats min–1 in the CON rats, and 72 ± 5 mmHg and 357 ± 12 beats min–1 in the RD rats. There were no significant differences in the basal values before each bout of muscle stimulation.

Figure 1 shows examples of developed tension in triceps surae muscles, AP, HR, RCBF, RCVC, RSNA and 1 s integrated RSNA before and during left tibial nerve stimulation (2 x MT) in a CON rat (Fig. 1A) and a RD rat (Fig. 1C). The detailed data of RSNA before and during the stimulation are shown in Fig. 1B). In both rats, the stimulation generated muscle tension and increased AP and HR. In the CON rat, the stimulation did not induce marked changes in RCBF, but increased RSNA and decreased RCVC. In contrast, the stimulation increased RCBF and did not change RCVC in the RD rat. Figure 2 shows examples of developed tension in triceps surae muscles, AP, HR, RCBF, RCVC, RSNA and 1 s integrated RSNA before and during passive stretch of the Achilles tendon in a CON rat (Fig. 2A) and a RD rat (Fig. 2C). The developed tension was set at a similar level as that during static contraction. The detailed data of RSNA before and during the stretch are shown in Fig. 2B). The stretch increased AP and HR in both rats. In the CON rat, the stretch did not change RCBF, but increased RSNA and decreased RCVC. In contrast, the stretch increased RCBF and did not change RCVC in the RD rat.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.  Reflex responses to static contraction before and after renal denervation
Examples of developed tension in the triceps surae muscles, AP, HR, RCBF, RCVC, RSNA, and 1 s integrated RSNA (Int RSNA) before and during 30 s of static contraction of the triceps surae muscles evoked by tibial nerve stimulation (2 x MT) in CON (A) and RD (C) rats. Higher magnifications of RSNA for 1 s before and during tibial nerve stimulation are shown in (B). The recorded periods are indicated by arrows in A.

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.  Reflex responses to passive stretch before and after renal denervation
Examples of developed tension in the triceps surae muscles, AP, HR, RCBF, RCVC, RSNA, and 1 s integrated RSNA before and during 30 s of passive stretch of the triceps surae muscles in a CON (A) and a RD rat (C). Higher magnifications of RSNA for 1 s before and during passive stretch are shown in (B). The recorded periods are indicated by arrows in A.

 
Figure 3 shows peak muscle tension and responses in AP and HR to static contraction or passive stretch. Muscle tension was similar between the trials (+344 ± 34, +346 ± 18, +378 ± 11 and +375 ± 16 g in static contraction in CON, static contraction in RD, passive stretch in CON and passive stretch in RD, respectively). Both static contraction and passive stretch induced significant pressor responses, and there were no significant differences between the trials (+14 ± 3, +10 ± 2, +11 ± 2 and +10 ± 2 mmHg in static contraction in CON, static contraction in RD, passive stretch in CON and passive stretch in RD, respectively). Static contraction significantly increased HR in CON rats (+6 ± 1 beats min–1), but showed no significant effect on HR in RD rats (+3 ± 1 beats min–1). Likewise, passive stretch significantly increased HR in CON rats (+7 ± 2 beats min–1), but did not significantly affect HR in RD rats (+3 ± 1 beats min–1).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.  Developed tension and AP and HR responses to muscle stimulation
Peak changes in tension, AP, and HR to static contraction (left side) or passive stretch (right side) in CON rats (open bars) and RD rats (solid bars). In the static contraction trials, these variables were recorded in 17 CON rats and 12 RD rats. In the passive stretch trials, variables were recorded in 20 CON rats and 13 RD rats. The data were detected from the 1-s averaged values. Values represent mean changes (± S.E.M.). *: P < 0.05 versus baseline. HR responses to muscle stimulation in RD rats were not significant. There were no significant differences between AP and HR responses between the trials.

 
Figure 4 shows 5 s averaged changes in RSNA, RCBF and RCVC from baseline during static contraction and stretch for 30 s. Both static contraction and passive stretch significantly increased RSNA, which reached peak values within 5 s from the onset of the muscle stimulation (+19 ± 5 and +14 ± 4% in contraction and stretch, respectively). In CON rats, neither static contraction nor passive stretch significantly affected RCBF, but they significantly decreased RCVC from the baseline (–11 ± 2 and –12 ± 3% in contraction and stretch, respectively). In RD rats, static contraction did not significantly change either RCBF or RCVC, while passive stretch significantly increased RCBF but did not significantly change RCVC from baseline values. Changes in RCBF and RCVC during both static contraction and passive stretch were significantly greater in RD than in CON rats.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.  RSNA, RCBF and RSNA responses during muscle stimulation
Left: 5-s averaged changes in RSNA, RCBF and RCVC from baseline during static contraction in CON rats (open circles) and RD rats (solid circles). RSNA were recorded in 11 CON rats. RCBF were recorded in 11 CON rats and 12 RD rats. Right: 5-s averaged changes in RSNA, RCBF, and RCVC from baseline during static contraction in CON rats (open circles) and RD rats (solid circles). RSNA were recorded in 15 CON rats. RCBF were recorded in 11 CON rats and 13 RD rats. Values represent mean changes (± S.E.M.). *: P < 0.05 versus baseline. #: P < 0.05 between CON and RD. The 30-s muscle stimulations are indicated by black bars.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The main results of the present study were that both static contraction and passive stretch increased AP, HR and RSNA and decreased RCVC, and that renal denervation abolished the decreases in RCVC during both contraction and stretch. The decreases in RCVC indicate that renal cortical vasoconstriction occurred. These data demonstrated that both the EPR and its mechanically sensitive component, the muscle mechanoreflex, induce renal cortical vasoconstriction through sympathetic activation in rats.

Recent studies have investigated the effects of congestive heart failure (CHF) or disuse atrophy on the pressor response to activation of the EPR by using the decerebrate rat model. CHF increases the pressor response to activation of the EPR (Smith et al. 2003), and the exaggerated response is based on an enhanced muscle mechanoreflex (Smith et al. 2003; Li et al. 2004) and an attenuated muscle metaboreflex (Li et al. 2004; Smith et al. 2005). Disuse atrophy enhances the muscle mechanoreflex (Hayashi et al. 2005). These findings suggest that the diseases plastically change the nature of the neural arc of the EPR and then alter cardiovascular regulation during exercise through the arc. There have been no previous studies in which the sympathetic response to activation of the EPR in the decerebrate rat model has been investigated. The present study, in which we recorded sympathetic nerve activity in decerebrate rats, should provide an appropriate and useful model for investigating issues regarding the role played by the EPR in cardiovascular regulation during exercise in both health and disease. Furthermore, cellular and molecular tools not available in larger animals and humans may be used in this rat model.

The present observations of sympathetically mediated renal cortical vasoconstriction during the EPR or the muscle mechanoreflex support the results of previous studies in cats and humans. In anaesthetized cats, activation of the EPR both by static contraction or the muscle mechanoreflex by passive stretch of the triceps surae muscles increased RSNA and induced renal vasoconstriction (Matsukawa et al. 1992). In humans, renal vasoconstriction occurred during static handgrip exercise as well as during postexercise ischaemia (activation of the muscle metaboreflex; Middlekauff et al. 1997; Momen et al. 2003). In addition, involuntary biceps muscle contraction evoked by percutaneous electrical stimulation induced renal vasoconstriction within a few seconds from the onset of contraction, suggesting that the muscle mechanoreflex also induces renal vasoconstriction (Momen et al. 2003).

Although the present findings were consistent with those of a previous study in anaesthetized cats (Matsukawa et al. 1992), there is a conflict in that static muscle contraction significantly decreased renal blood flow (velocity) in anaesthetized cats (Matsukawa et al. 1992), whereas the muscle stimulation did not affect RCBF in the decerebrate rats. This may be due to species differences and/or the presence of anaesthesia. Moreover, the magnitude of activation of the EPR may also be different between the two studies. The developed tension in triceps surae muscles was relatively greater per animal weight in the previous study (Matsukawa et al. 1992) compared with the present study. Thus, the activation of the EPR in the present study may be less than in the previous study and may not be great enough to reduce RCBF.

The developed tension in static muscle contraction was small compared to another study using decerebrate rats (Smith et al. 2001). We can point out several differences in the procedures to evoke muscle contraction between the two studies: electrically stimulated nerves (ventral root and tibial nerves), stimulus parameter used to evoke contraction, the age and size of the animals, the position of the animals during muscle contraction and/or the preload tension prior to contraction.

By the use renal denervation, the decreases in RCVC during contraction or stretch were abolished, whereas the pressor response was not changed. In RD rats, vessels in organs other than the kidney might have been constricted more powerfully than in CON rats, compensating the pressor response to contraction or stretch. However, it is unclear whether this hypothetical mechanism exists.

The significant increases in HR response to activation of the EPR or the muscle mechanoreflex were abolished by renal denervation. The reason for the abolishment of the increase in HR is unclear. A possibility is that the denervation might also have abolished the nerve activity to the adrenal medulla. Muscular activity increases the secretion of adrenaline from the adrenal medulla, possibly due to adrenal sympathetic activation (Nishiyasu et al. 1998; Vissing et al. 1991), which is known to increase heart rate (Motomura et al. 1990).

The method used for decerebration in the present model left appropriate brainstem medullary sites intact necessary to mediate reflex responses to muscle contraction (Hayashi, 2003). Neuroanatomical and electrophysiological studies suggested that intact sites, such as nucleus tractus solitarii, rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) and lateral tegmental field, receive input from afferents responsive to muscle contraction (Bauer et al. 1990; Iwamoto & Waldrop, 1996; Li et al. 1998; Toney & Mifflin, 2000). Neurones in the RVLM innervate preganglionic sympathetic nerves in the spinal cord monosynaptically and are responsible for basal sympathetic discharge (Sved et al. 2001). The activation of the RVLM during contraction and stretch would have contributed to increases in RSNA and renal sympathetic vasoconstriction in the present study.

In summary, to investigate the role played by the EPR in sympathetic regulation of the renal circulation in rats, we examined renal sympathetic and circulatory responses to static contraction of the triceps surae muscles in the decerebrate rat model. Static contraction increased AP, HR and RSNA and decreased RCVC. Likewise, passive stretch of the muscles induced similar responses. Renal denervation abolished the decreases in RCVC during contraction and stretch. We conclude that both the exercise pressor reflex and its mechanically sensitive component, the muscle mechanoreflex, induce renal cortical vasoconstriction through sympathetic activation in rats. The present experimental set-up, in which we recorded sympathetic nerve activity in decerebrate rats, should provide an effective approach for answering important issues regarding the function of the EPR in both health and disease.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bauer RM, Iwamoto GA & Waldrop TG (1990). Discharge patterns of ventrolateral medulla during muscular contraction. Am J Physiol 259, R606–R611.

Coote JH, Hilton SM & Perez Gonzalez JF (1971). The reflex nature of the pressor response to muscular exercise. J Physiol 215, 789–804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hammond RL, Augustyniak RA, Rossi NF, Churchill PC, Lapanowski K & O'Leary DS (2000). Heart failure alters the strength and mechanisms of the muscle metaboreflex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278, H818–H828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hayashi N (2003). Exercise pressor reflex in decerebrate and anesthetized rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284, H2026–H2033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hayashi N, Koba S & Yoshida T (2005). Disuse atrophy increases muscle mechanoreflex in rats. J Appl Physiol 99, 1442–1445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ishide T, Pearce WJ & Ally A (2002). Cardiovascular responses during stimulation of hindlimb skeletal muscle nerves in anesthetized rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29, 689–695.[CrossRef][Medline]

Iwamoto GA & Waldrop TG (1996). Lateral tegmental field neurons sensitive to muscular contraction: a role in pressor reflex. Brain Res Bull 41, 111–120.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kaufman MP & Forster HV (1996). Reflexes controlling circulatory, ventilatory and airway responses to exercise. In Handbook of Physiology, section 12, Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems, ed. Rowell LB & Shepherd JT, chap. 10, pp. 381–447. Oxford University Press, New York.

Kaufman MP, Longhurst JC, Rybicki KJ, Wallach JH & Mitchell JH (1983). Effects of static muscular contraction on impulse activity of groups III and IV afferents in cats. J Appl Physiol 55, 105–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kramer JM & Waldrop TG (2001). Reflex cardiovascular responses originating in exercising muscles of mice. J Appl Physiol 90, 579–585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li J, Potts JT & Mitchell JH (1998). Effect of barodenervation on c-Fos expression in the medulla induced by static muscle contraction in cats. Am J Physiol 274, H901–H908.

Li J, Sinoway AN, Gao Z, Maile MD, Pu M & Sinoway LI (2004). Muscle mechanoreflex and metaboreflex responses after myocardial infarction in rats. Circulation 110, 3049–3054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McCloskey DI & Mitchell JH (1972). Reflex cardiovascular and respiratory responses originating in exercising muscle. J Physiol 224, 173–186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Matsukawa K, Wall PT, Wilson LB & Mitchell JH (1992). Neurally mediated renal vasoconstriction during isometric muscle contraction in cats. Am J Physiol 262, H833–H838.

Middlekauff HR, Chiu J, Hamilton MA, Fonarow GC, MacLellan WR, Hage A, Moriguchi J & Patel J (2004). Muscle mechanoreceptor sensitivity in heart failure. Am J Physiol 287, H1937–H1943.

Middlekauff HR, Nitzsche EU, Nguyen A, Hoh CK & Gibbs GG (1997). Modulation of renal cortical blood flow during static exercise in humans. Circ Res 80, 62–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Momen A, Bower D, Boehmer J, Kunselman AR, Leuenberger UA & Sinoway LI (2004). Renal blood flow in heart failure patients during exercise. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287, H2834–H2839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Momen A, Leuenberger UA, Ray CA, Cha S & Sinoway LI (2003). Renal vascular responses to static handgrip: role of the muscle mechanoreflex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285, H1247–H1253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Motomura S, Reinhard-Zerkowski H, Daul A & Brodde OE (1990). On the physiologic role of ß-2 adrenoceptors in the human heart: in vitro and in vivo studies. Am Heart J 119, 608–619.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nishiyasu T, Tan N, Morimoto K, Sone R & Murakami N (1998). Cardiovascular and humoral responses to sustained muscle metaboreflex activation in humans. J Appl Physiol 84, 116–122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ogoh S, Wasmund WL, Keller DM, O-Yurvati A, Gallagher KM, Mitchell JH & Raven PB (2002). Role of central command in carotid baroreflex resetting in humans during static exercise. J Physiol 543, 349–364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Plowey ED & Waldrop TG (2004). Cobalt injections into the pedunculopontine nuclei attenuate the reflex diaphragmatic responses to muscle contraction in rats. J Appl Physiol 96, 301–307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Potts JT & Mitchell JH (1998). Rapid resetting of carotid baroreceptor reflex by afferent input from skeletal muscle receptors. Am J Physiol 275, H2000–H2008.

Rowell LB (1986). Control of individual vascular beds: splanchnic and renal circulations. In Human Circulation Regulation During Physical Stress, chapter 4, pp. 78–95. Oxford University Press, New York.

Smith SA, Mammen PP, Mitchell JH & Garry MG (2003). Role of the exercise pressor reflex in rats with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 108, 1126–1132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith SA, Mitchell JH & Garry MG (2001). Electrically induced static exercise elicits a pressor response in the decerebrate rat. J Physiol 537, 961–970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith SA, Williams MA, Mitchell JH, Mammen PP & Garry MG (2005). The capsaicin-sensitive afferent neuron in skeletal muscle is abnormal in heart failure. Circulation 111, 2056–2065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stebbins CL, Brown B, Levin D & Longhurst JC (1988). Reflex effect of skeletal muscle mechanoreceptor stimulation on the cardiovascular system. J Appl Physiol 65, 1539–1547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sved AF, Cano G & Card JP (2001). Neuroanatomical specificity of the circuits controlling sympathetic outflow to different targets. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28, 115–119.[CrossRef][Medline]

Toney GM & Mifflin SM (2000). Sensory modalities conveyed in the hindlimb somatic afferent input to nucleus tractus solitarius. J Appl Physiol 88, 2062–2073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Victor RG, Rotto DM, Pryor SL & Kaufman MP (1988). Stimulation of renal sympathetic activity by static contraction: evidence for mechanoreceptor-induced reflexes from skeletal muscle. Circ Res 64, 592–599.

Vissing J, Wilson LB, Mitchell JH & Victor RG (1991). Static muscle contraction reflexly in adrenal sympathetic nerve activity increases rats. Am J Physiol 261, R1307–R1312.[Medline]

Waldrop TG, Eldridge FL, Iwamoto GA & Mitchell JH (1996). Central neural control of respiration and circulation during exercise. In Handbook of Physiology, section 12, Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems, ed. Rowell LB & Shepherd JT, chap. 9, pp. 333–380. Oxford University Press, New York.

Wilson LB, Dyke CK, Pawelczyk JA, Wall PT & Mitchell JH (1994). Cardiovascular and renal nerve responses to static muscle contraction of decerebrate rabbits. J Appl Physiol 77, 2449–2455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


    Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Dr Marc P. Kaufman (University of California Davis, USA) for his critical reading of the manuscript. This study was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan to N.H. (no. 15700418) and Sasagawa Scientific Research Grant from Japan Science Society to S.K.

Author's present address
T. Yoshida: Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Japan. S. Koba: Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, USA.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Momen, J. Cui, P. McQuillan, and L. I. Sinoway
Local prostaglandin blockade attenuates muscle mechanoreflex-mediated renal vasoconstriction during muscle stretch in humans
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2184 - H2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Koba, J. Xing, L. I. Sinoway, and J. Li
Sympathetic nerve responses to muscle contraction and stretch in ischemic heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H311 - H321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
N. T. Kuipers, C. L. Sauder, M. L. Kearney, and C. A. Ray
Changes in forearm muscle temperature alter renal vascular responses to isometric handgrip
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3432 - H3439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Koba, J. Xing, L. I. Sinoway, and J. Li
Differential sympathetic outflow elicited by active muscle in rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2335 - H2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Nakamoto and K. Matsukawa
Muscle mechanosensitive receptors close to the myotendinous junction of the Achilles tendon elicit a pressor reflex
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2007; 102(6): 2112 - 2120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
P. B Raven
Neural Control of the Circulation during Exercise Themed Issue
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 25 - 26.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/1/111    most recent
expphysiol.2005.031666v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koba, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koba, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Themed Issue papers
Right arrow Cardiovascular control


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS