|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 USDA-ARS, Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Received 29 December 2005;
accepted after revision 13 January 2006; first published online 23 January 2006)
Corresponding author H. G. Klemcke: US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3400 Rawley E. Chambers Avenue, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA. Email: harold.klemcke{at}amedd.army.mil
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since the adrenal anlage does not appear until day 20 in swine (Whitehead, 1903), the maternal adrenal is the most likely source of this intra-uterine cortisol at these earlier gestational stages. Therefore, with a primary single source of cortisol (maternal adrenal) as a target for regulation, this is an optimal time interval in which to test effects of cortisol on early porcine conceptus development. We have previously shown that glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA, and the cortisol-metabolizing enzyme 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II mRNA and activity are present in porcine placentae by day 24 of gestation, suggesting a role for cortisol during the subsequent developmental stage (Klemcke et al. 2003). The objective of the present study was to determine whether altered plasma concentrations of maternal cortisol prior to functioning of the embryonic adrenal are associated with altered porcine conceptus development or survival. Two corollaries to this objective were: (1) to determine the presence or absence of GR mRNA expression in conceptus tissues, because GR must be present if cortisol is to have direct effects on the conceptus; and (2) to determine whether one component of development influenced by cortisol is the allantoic fluid volume and composition.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nineteen white crossbred female pigs (gilts; Sus scrofa; 136 ± 3 kg, mean ±S.E.M.) were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) vehicle (n= 7); (2) metyrapone [M; a cortisol and aldosterone synthesis inhibitor (Spark, 1971; Yanagibashi et al. 1988); 8 mg kg1 body weight; n= 6]; or (3) metyrapone + cortisol (M + C; 100 µg kg1; n= 6). Pigs were naturally bred to similar breed boars after demonstrating one complete estrous cycle. On day 8 or 9, pigs were initially anaesthetized with 1.01.2 g sodium thiopentone and maintained under halothane anaesthesia (34% in 9796% O2). Using sterile procedures, an indwelling jugular catheter (microrenathane, 0.04' i.d., 0.08'o.d. (1.02 mm i.d., 2.04 mm o.d.), Braintree Scientific, Braintree, MA, USA) previously coated on its internal and external surfaces with tridodecyl methyl ammonium chloride (TDMAC)-heparin (Polysciences Inc., Warrington, PA, USA) was inserted as previously described (Ford & Maurer, 1978; Klemcke et al. 1987). Additionally, a subcutaneous microrenathane catheter that was not pretreated with TDMAC-heparin was inserted subcutaneously (S.C.) in the inguinal region. This latter catheter was punctured with 1015 holes using an 18 gauge needle in the last 25 cm that would lie S.C. in the inguinal region. These holes would allow for multiple ports through which the drugs could pass. Catheters were exteriorized to the dorsal cervical (jugular) or lumbar (subcutaneous) regions and attached to the skin as previously described (Ford & Maurer, 1978; Klemcke et al. 1987). Prophylactic injections of procaine penicillin (300 000 units ml1; Hanford Mfg. Co., Syracuse, NY, USA) were administered intramuscular (i.m.) during surgery and once more subcutaneous (s.c.) 4 days later to prevent surgery-associated infections.
Pigs were allowed to recover from this initial surgery for 56 days. During this time and for the remainder of the study pigs were housed individually in pens (1.77 x 2.13 m). An investigator would interact with the pigs 23 times daily, between catheterization and treatment initiation, in order to acclimate them to the subsequent treatment regimen. Beginning on day 14 of pregnancy, pigs were injected via the S.C. catheter at 07.00, 14.00 and 21.00 h daily until day 19. On days 14 and 18,
9 ml blood samples were taken via the jugular catheter prior to injection. Doses of metyrapone used were based on those previously used in neonatal pigs injected intramuscularly (Martin et al. 1973; Sangild et al. 1993; Wu et al. 2000). The cortisol dose was based on previously measured plasma concentrations and the metabolic clearance rate of cortisol in pregnant pigs (Klemcke, 1995). Furthermore, a preliminary study with two pigs suggested that 8 mg kg1 of metyrapone was more effective in lowering plasma cortisol concentrations than 4 mg kg1, and that 100 µg kg1 cortisol was effective in reversing the effects of metyrapone (data not shown). On day 20 no additional treatments were provided, and the pigs were anaesthetized as described above. Laparotomies and complete hysterectomies were performed beginning at
08.00 h. Once the tract was removed, its exterior was thoroughly washed with warm (37°C) sterile saline to remove maternal blood. An incision was made at the site of each conceptus, and it was gently dissected from the uterus. The allantois was cut, and the allantoic fluid was collected, weighed and placed on ice. With the aid of a dissecting microscope, the embryo was then dissected from the amnion, yolk sac and allantois, weighed and then rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. The allantois was blotted dry on sterile gauze, weighed and then rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. Within the uterus at each implantation site, very fine threads of trophoderm (trophectoderm and splanchnic mesoderm; Patten, 1948) were found after the embryo was removed. Trophoderm for three embryos was saved individually, and a pool of trophoderm was also saved for each pig. These tissues were also rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored frozen at 80°C. The dams were allowed to recover from the surgery and were no longer a part of the experiment. All procedures involving use of animals were reviewed and approved by our institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Drug preparations and administration
Metyrapone (2-methyl-1, 2-di-3-pyridyl-1-propanone, 98% pure; Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI, USA) was added to a solution (1:1; v/v) of sterile glycerol and 0.15 M NaCl (glycerol-saline; pH 7.4), at a concentration of 1.2 g (10 ml)1. Cortisol (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was also added to appropriate metyrapone preparations at a concentration of 15 mg (10 ml)1. Both preparations were warmed to assist in suspension, and stored in sterile bottles at 37°C. Based on the body weight of the gilt, appropriate volumes of these preparations or of glycerol-saline vehicle were injected into the subcutaneous catheter. These preparations were flushed through the catheter with heparinized saline solution.
Blood sampling
Blood samples were withdrawn into 9 ml syringes (LiHeparin, Sarstedt, Newton, NC, USA) from the jugular catheter, placed on ice, centrifuged at 1500g, and plasma was stored frozen at 20°C. Jugular catheters were flushed with 610 ml of heparinized saline after each use.
Assay procedures
Cortisol. Plasma cortisol was measured using HPLC procedures for isolation and ultraviolet detection as previously validated and reported for our laboratory (Klemcke, 1995). Briefly, to measure procedural losses, 200 ng of the synthetic steroid flumethasone (Sigma) was added in 50 µl MeOH to 2 ml plasma. After addition of 200 µl 0.75 N NaOH, samples were extracted with 4 ml of ethyl acetate. Extracts were dried under nitrogen, and samples were reconstituted in 100 µl of mobile phase (see below). Standards were prepared in a similar manner. Subsequently, 20 µl of sample or standard were injected onto a 100 x 2 mm octadecylsilane reverse phase column with 3 µm particle size (ODS-Hypersil; Keystone Scientific, Bellefonte, PA, USA) that was used in conjunction with a 3 µm ODS prefilter. The mobile phase (7% acetonitrile, 9% tetrahydrofuran, 84% water and 0.5% triethylamine, with pH adjusted to 6.5 using citric acid) was pumped at a flow rate of 0.3 ml min1. Steroids were detected at a wavelength of 242 nm. Areas under response curves were converted to mass units via use of a four-point standard curve (1.2, 2.4, 4.8 and 9.6 ng per 20 µl injection). The sensitivity of this procedure (lowest standard in the linear range of the standard curve) was 1.2 ng, and the interassay variability for seven assays was 8.6% based on a sample that was extracted and measured in all assays. The immediate precursor of cortisol, 11-deoxycortisol, was analysed using the same procedure and at the same time as cortisol. A similar four-point standard curve was used with a sensitivity of 1.2 ng (lowest standard in the linear range of the standard curve). The interassay coefficient of variation (c.v.) for 11-deoxycortisol was 13.0%. These procedures were necessary for cortisol because radioimmunoassay (RIA) procedures using antibodies from two different companies (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Houston, TX, USA), with or without extraction, would not validate properly in plasma from metyrapone-injected pigs.
Attempts were also made to use this procedure for measurement of allantoic cortisol. Allantoic fluid from embryos was combined for each pregnant pig. All volumes were adjusted to 8 ml with 0.01 M sodium phosphate containing 0.15 M NaCl and 0.1% gelatin, pH 7.4 (PBSG). These samples were extracted as described above except that two 15 ml volumes of ethyl acetate were used. However, additional peaks appeared on the HPLC chromatogram that eluted very near the cortisol peak and interfered with its accurate evaluation. Hence, allantoic values are not presented.
Aldosterone.
Plasma aldosterone was measured via RIA using kits purchased from Diagnostic Products. To 1 ml of plasma
6700 d.p.m. of 3H-aldosterone (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) in 50 µl of PBSG was added to measure procedural losses. Plasma was then extracted with 4 ml ethyl acetate; extracts were dried under N2 and reconstituted in 800 µl of PBSG. The average recovery was 95.7%. Aldosterone was measured in 200 µl aliquots of this reconstituted extract. The sensitivity of this RIA, based on the lowest standard in the linear range of the standard curve, was 1.9 pg. All samples were analysed in two assays with a within-assay c.v. of 2.4% and a between assay c.v. of 2.5%. Serial dilutions of pregnant pig plasma extracts had a slope (b=1.02) that did not differ (P > 0.05) from that of the standard curve (b=0.92). Accuracy estimates after adding 1.524 pg aldosterone to plasma averaged 108.6%, and a plot of measured versus expected values had a slope (b= 1.09) that did not differ from 1. Serial dilutions of plasma extract from a metyrapone-injected pig and to which exogenous aldosterone was added had a slope (b=0.93) that did not differ from that of the standard curve (b=0.84). Average accuracy of estimates after adding known amounts of aldosterone to plasma from a metyrapone-injected pig was 119%, and a plot of expected versus measured values had a slope (b= 1.10) that did not differ from 1.
Allantoic Na+, K+, glucose and protein. Sodium and potassium were measured in diluted aliquots of allantoic fluid using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry procedures and a Perkin Elmer Model 1100 Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer Analytical Instruments, Shelton, CT). Allantoic glucose was measured using a CIBA-Corning Glucose HK Reagents (Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp., Oberlin, OH). Protein was measured using a modified Lowry protein procedure (Markwell et al. 1978). All measures were conducted in the same three randomly chosen conceptuses per pig, and each procedure was conducted in duplicate (glucose and protein) or triplicate (Na+ and K+). For two vehicle injected gilts, problems were encountered accurately collecting and measuring allantoic fluid, hence allantoic fluid measures are reported for only 5 vehicle injected control gilts.
RNA isolation and Northern blot analyses. Total RNA was isolated from embryonic, allantoic and trophodermal tissues of three conceptuses per pregnant pig using RNeasy Kits (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA, USA). Total RNA (20 g per lane) was loaded onto denaturing Mops 1.25% agaroseformaldehyde gels and electrophoresis conducted. Subsequently RNA was transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond-N, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) via capillary blotting, and fixed to the membrane using UV cross-linking (UV Stratalinker 2400, Stratagene, LaJolla, CA, USA).
Porcine specific cDNA for porcine GR were generated via reverse transcription of total RNA isolated from female pig liver as previously described (Klemcke et al. 2003). For Northern analyses of GR mRNA 32P-labelled cDNAs were prepared using PCR procedures, 32P-dCTP (Dupont New England Nuclear, Wilmington, DE, USA) and primers specific for GR and ß-actin transcripts.
Northern analyses using these labelled cDNAs were conducted essentially as previously described for erythropoietin mRNA (Klemcke et al. 2001). To ensure that variability among processing operations was evenly distributed across all treatments, RNA from each treatment was equally represented on each gel/membrane, and membranes were used as a blocking factor in statistical analyses. Densitometric measures were conducted with an EPI Chemi Darkroom (UVP, Inc.; Upland, CA, USA) used in conjunction with the NIH Image program. In some instances mRNA expression from the tissues of a given conceptus could not be measured validly owing to technical errors; hence, data presented represent two or three conceptuses per gilt.
Mention of trade names is necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.
Statistics
Data were analysed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 1999) and program PROC MIXED contained in SAS. Plasma cortisol, aldosterone and 11-deoxycortisol concentrations were analysed using a two-way analysis of variance that modelled the effects of treatmentday and treatmentday interactions. Such an analysis statistically combines data across time periods within each day, thereby emphasizing chronic cumulative effects of treatment. For measures such as embryonic weight, allantoic weight, allantoic fluid volume, etc., a one-way ANOVA using PROC MIXED was used wherein pig within treatment was declared a random effect. Data were analysed for normality of distribution using PROC Univariate Normal, and for homogeneity of variance using Levene's test, and transformed to log or square-root functions where appropriate to fulfil assumptions of ANOVA. Comparison of individual treatment means were made by either a priori orthogonal contrasts or via the a posteriori Bonferroni test with adjusted probability levels to compensate for multiple comparisons. Probability levels resulting from these a priori and a posteriori comparisons are presented in the text portion of the Results section. Curvilinear relationships between maternal plasma cortisol and embryonic measures were determined and analysed using PROC MIXED and analysis of covariance techniques (ANOCVA). All data for mRNA bands of interest were also analysed using PROC MIXED and one-way ANOCVA with treatments as the main factor, and gel as a random factor. Each mRNA of interest was adjusted using ANOCVA and expression of ß-actin in the same lane as a covariate to account for potential differences in lane loading and membrane transfer. Data presented are the least squares means and associated standard errors. For all statistical analyses, a probability level of
0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Compared with vehicle-treated controls, plasma aldosterone concentrations on day 14 (Fig. 1C) in M- and M + C-injected animals were decreased (P
0.05) when time periods after treatment initiation are considered. On day 18, plasma aldosterone concentrations in M- and M + C-injected pigs were decreased (P
0.05) compared with vehicle-injected control pigs. Day effects were not noted.
Treatments had no effect on: the number of corpora lutea; number of viable embryos; percentage survival; embryonic, allantoic and allantoic fluid weights; allantoic fluid concentrations of sodium, potassium, glucose and protein; and total allantoic content of glucose and protein (Tables 1 and 2).
|
|
0.01) compared with vehicle-treated control pigs on days 14 and 18, respectively (data not shown). If cortisol concentrations from these two pigs are not included in the data, then metyrapone decreased plasma cortisol concentrations by 88% on both days 14 and 18. However, there was no clear justification for eliminating the pigs from the treatment group, since metyrapone did increase 11-deoxycortisol, and assay procedures appeared to be valid for those pigs. If data are reanalysed with these two pigs eliminated, there remains an absence of treatment effects on any variables presented in Tables 1 and 2 (data not shown). To allow inclusion of all pigs in analyses while taking into account an apparent absence of metyrapone-induced reductions in steroid concentrations, an alternative treatment-independent approach was used to examine the data. Hence, analysis of covariance procedures indicated significant treatment-independent second-order polynomial relationships between maternal plasma cortisol concentrations (for each pig the average cortisol concentration was determined in samples after treatment was initiated on day 14, at 14.00 and 21.00 h, and in samples taken on day 18, at 07.00, 14.00 and 21.00 h) and allantoic membrane weight (Fig. 2A), allantoic fluid weight (Fig. 2B), embryonic weight (Fig. 2C) and allantoic glucose concentrations (Fig. 2D). Allantoic glucose exhibited a U-shaped doseresponse curve to increasing maternal cortisol concentrations (Fig. 2D), whereas the remainder showed inverted U-shaped relationships (Fig. 2AC). It is noteworthy that these relationships were unique with cortisol, and did not occur with aldosterone (data not shown).
|
7.5 kb. In embryonic tissue and in allantoic tissue there were no treatment effects on this GR mRNA expression. However, in trophodermal tissue, GR mRNA expression was reduced in M- and in M + C-injected pigs when compared with controls (Fig. 3). There were no significant treatment-independent linear or polynomial relationships between maternal plasma cortisol concentrations and allantoic, embryonic or trophodermal tissue mRNA expression. There were, however, U-shaped responses to increasing maternal aldosterone concentrations, expressed as log10, and both embryonic (y= 59.1 65.36x+ 18.2x2; P
0.01) and trophodermal GR mRNA (y= 63.4 72.26x+ 20.7x2; P < 0.01).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alternatively, the results may reflect the need for larger experimental sample sizes to overcome the inherent large between-animal variability. Additionally, plasma cortisol and aldosterone concentrations were significantly reduced, but not completely eliminated, by the concentration and frequency of metyrapone used. Indeed, in humans during oral metyrapone administration (1000 mg every 2 hours for 12 hours, followed by 500 mg every 2 hours for 12 hours, Veldhuis et al. 2001; Liu et al. 2005), blood sampling at 10 min intervals for 24 h revealed reduced cortisol concentrations primarily during the morning surge of cortisol and early afternoon hours. Hence, not only does the possibility exist that the absence of diminished cortisol concentrations in two pigs may be more apparent than real because of insufficient sampling frequency, but also the remaining plasma corticosteroid concentrations in all metyrapone-treated pigs, if biologically relevant, could have been sufficient to maintain any steroid-dependent functions.
If data are evaluated for relationships between maternal plasma hormonal concentrations and size or volume, in a treatment group-independent manner, then significant polynomial relationships are revealed. Such relationships may be serendipitous. Their interpretation is obfuscated by the presence of varying concentrations of other steroids at a given steroid-of-interest concentration, and assumes that the average plasma corticosteroid concentration used in the analyses accurately reflects the steroid environment encountered by the tissues throughout the study. Nevertheless, the presence of these relationships is noteworthy, and potentially of biological relevance. For example, such relationships (inverted U) may suggest that as cortisol increases at low concentrations, tissue responses are enhanced. Subsequently, after a certain cortisol concentration has been exceeded, the tissue response becomes reduced, and ultimately the response may be inhibited. Such biphasic responses to glucocorticoids have been documented in vitro and in vivo in a number of different tissues in other species (Smith et al. 1972; Canalis, 1983; Quirk et al. 1986; Liley et al. 1988; Braun et al. 1989; Gaillard et al. 1991; Iannuzzi et al. 1993; Papachristou et al. 1994; Buchanan et al. 2001). In the present study, the range of average cortisol concentrations per pig (1.5338.0 ng ml1 or 4.2105 nM) is 25-fold. This is considerably less than is often observed in vitro for biphasic responses (e.g. cortisol and effects on surfactant protein A mRNA in human fetal lung explant culture, 1010 000 nM (Liley et al. 1988); corticosterone effects on glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in preadipocyte cell line 109106M (Gaillard et al. 1991). However, it is a greater range than that used (4-fold differences) for in vivo biphasic responses to the injected synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Slotkin et al. 1992). Hence, it is quite conceivable that, within the range of endogenous cortisol measured, different responses could be elicited.
The glucosecortisol relationship was U-shaped, a mirror image of that observed with embryonic size and allantoic volume. Such a relationship has also been reported for dexamethasone and neonatal rat kidney function (Slotkin et al. 1992), and for hydrocortisone sodium succinate effects on rat gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis (Avunduk et al. 1992). Such curves are often associated with an abatement of adverse effects at increasingly low doses; for example, the effects of X-ray dose on cancer incidence (Calabrese & Baldwin, 1999). However, the biological relevance of the glucose response to cortisol in the present study is enigmatic.
An increase in allantoic fluid volume associated with increasing, albeit low, concentrations of maternal cortisol (Fig. 2B) may suggest an effect of cortisol on allantoic fluid accumulation. This allantoic fluid is thought to be important in the expansion of the allantoic membranes and their eventual apposition with the trophoderm, as well as the subsequent expansion of this chorion (Patten, 1948) and its contact with the maternal uterine epithelium (Bazer, 1989). Water entering the allantois is ultimately of maternal origin, but may enter the allantois via the embryonic kidney, or directly across the allantoic membrane. The relative contribution of each site may well vary during gestation (Bazer, 1989). The embryonic porcine mesonephros is present and functioning by day 18 to redistribute water (Marrable, 1971; Bazer et al. 1981). However, it was suggested that at early stages (e.g. day 20) porcine allantoic fluid primarily originates via ...secretion by the allantoic membranes (McCance & Dickerson, 1957). Previously, there has been evidence for progesterone, oestrogen and prolactin regulation of allantoic fluid volume and composition in pigs during early gestation (Goldstein et al. 1980; Bazer et al. 1981; McGovern et al. 1981; Dalton & Knight, 1983; Bazer, 1989). A potential role for aldosterone and cortisol in pigs has not been considered heretofore. In sheep, dexamethasone administration at
0.4 gestation (
64 days) led to increases in allantoic fluid owing to increased fetal urine output (Wintour et al. 1994). Both cortisol and aldosterone have the potential for regulating this allantoic fluid volume and ionic composition via effects on Na+, K+ and Cl transport (Celsi et al. 1991; Verrey et al. 1996) and associated movement of water (Macknight & Leaf, 1977; Phillips et al. 1999).
Expression of glucocorticoid mRNA was evident in all conceptus tissues examined. If this mRNA is translated into active GR, then these data suggest the presence of GR in porcine conceptuses at this early gestational stage that could be capable of responding to cortisol in the uterine environment. Such data add additional credence to the relevance of the putative biphasic doseresponse curves and supplement existing information concerning the ontogeny of embryonic GR in other species (Kitraki et al. 1997; Speirs et al. 2004; Hong et al. 2004). Indeed, evidence is presented for a metyrapone-associated decrease in trophoderm GR mRNA that was not reversed with concomitant administration of cortisol. This suggests that in this tissue aldosterone may regulate GR, although a direct effect of metyrapone cannot be excluded. The U-shaped doseresponse curves between aldosterone and trophodermal and embryonic mRNA are of additional interest. However, as with the glucosecortisol relationship, if real, the biological relevance is not easily understood. Indeed there is precedence for aldosterone modulation of GR in other tissues and species (Luttge et al. 1989; O'Donnell & Meaney, 1994). The present data are the first suggestive evidence for a trophic effect of aldosterone on GR mRNA expression. Although aldosterone is capable of binding with the glucocorticoid receptor, in humans the affinity is
900-fold less than binding to the mineralocorticoid receptor (Rupprecht et al. 1993). Hence, the present data also provide some indirect evidence for the presence in trophoderm of mineralocorticoid receptors.
In summary, the presence of GR mRNA in all embryonic tissues, together with the previously demonstrated presence of cortisol in the early porcine intra-uterine environment (Klemcke et al. 1998), suggest the opportunity for glucocorticoid modulation of early porcine embryonic development. The biphasic corticosteroid-concentration versus tissue-measure curves further suggest the possibility that an appropriate corticosteroid environment is necessary for optimal porcine embryonic development. Nevertheless, these latter relationships, while noteworthy, cannot overshadow the absence of treatment-associated effects on most conceptus parameters.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anderson LL (1978). Growth, protein content and distribution of early pig embryos. Anat Rec 190, 143154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Avunduk C, Eastwood GL, Polakowski N & Burstein S (1992). Hydrocortisone has a biphasic effect on rat gastric mucosal prostaglandin generation in vivo: inhibition at low doses, stimulation at high doses. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 45, 329332.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bazer FW (1989). Allantoic fluid: regulation of volume and composition. Reprod Perinatal Med 11, 135155.
Bazer FW, Goldstein MH & Barron DH (1981). Water and electrolyte transport by pig chorioallantois. In Fertilization and Embryonic Development In Vitro, ed. Mastroianai JR & Biggers JD, pp. 299321. Plenum Publishing, New York.
Blackburn WR, Kaplan HS & McKay DG (1965). Morphologic changes in the developing rat placenta following prednisolone administration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 92, 234246.[Medline]
Braun S, Tranchant C, Vilquin JT, Labouret P, Warter JM & Poindron P (1989). Stimulating effects of prednisolone on acetylcholine receptor expression and myogenesis in primary culture of newborn rat muscle cells. J Neurol Sci 92, 119131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Buchanan TW, Brechtel A, Sollers JJ & Lovallo WR (2001). Exogenous cortisol exerts effects on the startle reflex independent of emotional modulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68, 203210.[CrossRef][Medline]
Calabrese EJ & Baldwin LA (1999). Reevaluation of the fundamental dose-response relationship. Bioscience 49, 725732.[CrossRef]
Canalis E (1983). Effect of glucocorticoids on type I collagen synthesis, alkaline phosphatase activity, and deoxyribonucleic acid content in cultured rat calvariae. Endocrinology 112, 931939.[Abstract]
Celsi G, Nishi A, Akusjarvi G & Aperia A (1991). Abundance of Na+-K+-ATPase mRNA is regulated by glucocorticoid hormones in infant rat kidneys. Am J Physiol 260, F192F197.
Dalton
DL
&
Knight
JW (1983). Effects of exogenous progesterone and estrone on conceptus development in swine. J Anim Sci
56, 13541361.
Ford JJ & Maurer RR (1978). Simple technique for chronic venous catheterization of swine. Lab Anim Sci 28, 615618.[Medline]
Fowden AL, Apatu RSK & Silver M (1995). The glucogenic capacity of the fetal pig: developmental regulation by cortisol. Exp Physiol 80, 457467.[Abstract]
Gaillard D, Wabitsch M, Pipy B & Negrel R (1991). Control of terminal differentiation of adipose precursor cells by glucocorticoids. J Lipid Res 32, 569579.[Abstract]
Goldstein MH, Bazer FW & Barron DH (1980). Characterization of changes in volume, osmolarity and electrolyte composition of porcine fetal fluids during gestation. Biol Reprod 22, 11681180.[Abstract]
Hong SH, Nah HY, Lee YJ, Lee JW, Park JH, Kim SJ, Lee JB, Yoon HS & Kim CH (2004). Expression of estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta, glucocorticoid receptor, and progesterone receptor genes in human embryonic stem cells and embryoid bodies. Mol Cells 18, 320325.[Medline]
Iannuzzi DM, Ertsey R & Ballard PL (1993). Biphasic glucocorticoid regulation of pulmonary SP-A: characterization of inhibitory process. Am J Physiol 264, L236L244.
Kitraki E, Kittas C & Stylianopoulou F (1997). Glucocorticoid receptor gene expression during rat embryogenesis. An in situ hybridization study. Differentiation 62, 2131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klemcke HG (1995). Placental metabolism of cortisol at mid- and late gestation in swine. Biol Reprod 53, 12931301.[Abstract]
Klemcke
HG, Kattesh
HG, Vallet
JL, Roberts
MP, McGuire
WJ
&
Christenson
RK (1998). Intrauterine cortisol, aldosterone, and corticosteroid binding globulin-like activity during early porcine pregnancy and the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod
58, 240247.
Klemcke HG, McGuire WJ & Christenson RK (1999). Cortisol concentrations in early porcine embryos. Life Sci 64, 13071312.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klemcke HG, Nienaber JA & Hahn GL (1987). Stressor-associated alterations in porcine plasma prolactin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 186, 333343.[Abstract]
Klemcke
HG, Sampath Kumar
R, Yang
K, Vallet
JL
&
Christenson
RK (2003). 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and glucocorticoid receptor messenger RNA expression in porcine placentae: effects of stage of gestation, breed, and uterine environment. Biol Reprod
69, 19451950.
Klemcke HG, Vallet JL, Christenson RK & Pearson PL (2001). Erythropoietin mRNA expression in pig embryos. Anim Reprod Sci 66, 93108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liley
HG, White
RT, Benson
BJ
&
Ballard
PL (1988). Glucocorticoids both stimulate and inhibit production of pulmonary surfactant protein A in fetal human lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
85, 90969100.
Liu
PY, Pincus
SM, Keenan
DM, Roelfsema
F
&
Veldhuis
JD (2005). Joint synchrony of reciprocal hormonal signaling in human paradigms of both ACTH excess and cortisol depletion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
289, E160E165.
Luttge WG, Rupp ME & Davda MM (1989). Aldosterone-stimulated down-regulation of both type I and type II adrenocorticosteroid receptors in mouse brain is mediated via type I receptors. Endocrinology 125, 817824.[Abstract]
McCance RA & Dickerson JWT (1957). The composition and origin of the foetal fluids of the pig. J Embryol Exp Morph 5, 4350.
McGovern PT, Morcom CB, de Sa WF & Dukelow WR (1981). Chorionic surface area in conceptuses from sows treated with progesterone and oestrogen during early pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 61, 439442.[Abstract]
Macknight
AD
&
Leaf
A (1977). Regulation of cellular volume. Physiol Rev
57, 510573.
Markwell MA, Haas SM, Bieber LL & Tolbert NE (1978). A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Anal Biochem 87, 206210.[CrossRef][Medline]
Marrable AW (1971). The Embryonic Pig. A Chronological Account. Pitman Medical, London.
Martin RJ, Patt JA, Eberhart RJ & Hartsook EW (1973). The effects of metyrapone and ACTH on the development of gluconeogenesis in the neonatal pig. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 144, 603608.[Medline]
O'Donnell D & Meaney MJ (1994). Aldosterone modulates glucocorticoid receptor binding in hippocampal cell cultures via the mineralocorticoid receptor. Brain Res 636, 4954.[CrossRef][Medline]
Papachristou DN, Liu JL & Patel YC (1994). Glucocorticoids regulate somatostatin peptide and steady state messenger ribonucleic acid levels in normal rat tissues and in a somatostatin-producing islet tumor cell line (1027B2). Endocrinology 134, 22592266.[Abstract]
Patten BM (1948). Embryology of the Pig, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
Phillips
JE, Wong
LB
&
Yeates
DB (1999). Bidirectional transepithelial water transport: measurement and governing mechanisms. Biophys J
76, 869877.
Quirk
SJ, Gannell
JE, Fullerton
MJ
&
Funder
JW (1986). Specificity and mechanism of biphasic action of glucocorticoids on
-lactalbumin production by rat mammary gland explants. Endocrinology
118, 909914.[Abstract]
Reinisch
JM, Simon
NG, Karow
WG
&
Gandelman
R (1978). Prenatal exposure to prednisone in humans and animals retards intrauterine growth. Science
202, 436438.
Rupprecht R, Reul JM, van Steensel B, Spengler D, Soder M, Berning B, Holsboer F & Damm K (1993). Pharmacological and functional characterization of human mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor ligands. Eur J Pharmacol 247, 145154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sangild PT, Diernaes L, Christiansen IJ & Skadhauge E (1993). Intestinal transport of sodium, glucose and immunoglobulin in neonatal pigs. Effect of glucocorticoids. Exp Physiol 78, 485497.[Abstract]
Sangild PT, Silver M, Fowden AL, Turvey A & Foltmann B (1994). Adrenocortical stimulation of stomach development in the prenatal pig. Biol Neonate 65, 378389.[Medline]
SAS Online DOC, Version 8 (1999). Statistical Analysis System, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Seckl JR, Cleasby M & Nyirenda MJ (2000). Glucocorticoids, 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehyrogenase, and fetal programming. Kidney Int 57, 14121417.[CrossRef][Medline]
Silver M (1990). Prenatal maturation, the timing of birth and how it may be regulated in domestic animals. Exp Physiol 75, 285307.[Medline]
Slotkin TA, Seidler FJ, Kavlock RJ & Gray JA (1992). Fetal dexamethasone exposure accelerates development of renal function: relationship to dose, cell differentiation and growth inhibition. J Dev Physiol 17, 5561.[Medline]
Smith RS, Sherman NA & Middleton E Jr (1972). Effect of hydrocortisone on immunoglobulin synthesis and secretion by human peripheral lymphocytes in vitro. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 43, 859870.[Medline]
Spark RF (1971). Simplified assessment of pituitary-adrenal reserve. Measurement of serum 11-deoxycortisol and cortisol after metyrapone. Ann Intern Med 75, 717723.[Medline]
Speirs HJ, Seckl JR & Brown RW (2004). Ontogeny of glucocorticoid receptor and 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type-1 gene expression identifies potential critical periods of glucocorticoid susceptibility during development. J Endocrinol 181, 105116.[Abstract]
Veldhuis
JD, Iranmanesh
A, Naftolowitz
D, Tatham
N, Cassidy
F
&
Carroll
BJ (2001). Corticotropin secretory dynamics in humans under low glucocorticoid feedback. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
86, 55545563.
Verrey F, Beron J & Spindler B (1996). Corticosteroid regulation of renal Na,K-ATPase. Miner Electrolyte Metab 22, 279292.[Medline]
Whitehead RH (1903). The histogenesis of the adrenal in the pig. Am J Anat 2, 349360.[CrossRef]
Wintour EM, Alcorn D, McFarlane A, Moritz K, Potocnik SJ & Tangalakis K (1994). Effect of maternal glucocorticoid treatment on fetal fluids in sheep at 0.4 gestation. Am J Physiol 266, R1174R1181.
Wu G, Flynn NE, Knabe DA & Jaeger LA (2000). A cortisol surge mediates the enhanced polyamine synthesis in porcine enterocytes during weaning. Am J Physiol 279, R554R559.
Yanagibashi K, Shackleton CH & Hall PF (1988). Conversion of 11-deoxycorticosterone and corticosterone to aldosterone by cytochrome P-450 11 beta-/18-hydroxylase from porcine adrenal. J Steroid Biochem 29, 665675.[CrossRef][Medline]
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. E. Michael and A. T. Papageorghiou Potential significance of physiological and pharmacological glucocorticoids in early pregnancy Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 497 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |