|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Themed Issue Papers |
1 Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Received 26 September 2006;
accepted after revision 9 November 2006; first published online 10 November 2006)
Corresponding author M. L. Smith: Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA. Email: msmith{at}hsc.unt.edu
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In patients with chronic OSA, there are significant elevations of production and circulation of catecholamines during sleep and wakefulness (Fletcher et al. 1987; Carlson et al. 1993; Marrone et al. 1993; Somers et al. 1995; Garcia-Rio et al. 2000). Marrone et al. (1993) illustrated that both noradrenaline and adrenaline were elevated in patients with sleep apnoea and that urinary adrenaline secretion decreased in the absence of apnoeas. Fletcher et al. (1987) and Carlson et al. (1993) both demonstrated elevated noradrenaline levels in OSA patients during the daytime, suggesting a physiological adaptation to hypoxia and apnoeas during sleep. Relative to a potential role of the chemoreceptors, it is not known whether patients were hypoxaemic during wakefulness. In most OSA patients, however, hypoxaemia during wakefulness is normally uncommon and mild; therefore, these data would suggest either that the chemoreflex control of sympathetic activity becomes tonically active at rest (normoxia), or that other mechanisms (e.g. sleep deprivation) contribute to the chronic elevation of sympathetic tone. Similarly, Garcia-Rio et al. (2000) found elevated nocturnal adrenaline levels that were correlated with the pressor response to hypoxia. Together, these data suggest that the elevated catecholamine concentrations found in this population may be mediated in part by the nighttime apnoeas, but also by altered autonomic control throughout the day.
Numerous studies also have shown that directly measured muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is elevated during normal wakeful breathing and during episodes of sleep apnoea in OSA patients (Carlson et al. 1993; Leuenberger et al. 1995; Somers et al. 1995; Saito et al. 1988). Narkiewicz & Somers (1997) compared MSNA in normal-weight subjects, obese subjects without OSA and obese subjects with OSA. During normal daytime breathing, the obese OSA subjects had significantly higher resting MSNA than the normal-weight subjects and obese subjects without OSA. These results strongly suggest that the increase in basal MSNA is independent of obesity in this population. Collectively, these studies imply that the high incidence of hypertension among OSA patients is, in part, due to chronically elevated MSNA. In this light, considerable attention has focused on the role of chemoreflex function, or dysfunction, in both the acute and chronic responses to sleep apnoea, and its potential role in imparting an increased risk of hypertension.
As noted, the majority of investigations into OSA and sympathetic tone and its control focus on microneurographic measures of MSNA. This measurement is thought to be reflective of normal reflex control of vascular beds which determine systemic vascular resistance and thus, arterial pressure. Thus, these studies address effects of apnoea and hypoxia on altered reflex control of sympathetic tone which would be expected to affect long-term arterial pressure and its control.
Chemoreceptors and OSA
Chemoreflex control of sympathetic activity. Until recently, the investigation of the physiological role of the chemoreceptors has generally been focused on the control of respiration. However, a growing body of evidence has shown that disturbed blood gases, whether acute, chronic or intermittent, can affect autonomic and cardiovascular function as well. Activation of the chemoreceptors by acute exposure to either hypoxia or hypercapnia is known to provoke a sympathoexcitatory response in humans (Xie et al. 2000; Shoemaker et al. 2002; Cutler et al. 2004b; Leuenberger et al. 2005). The effects appear to be more sensitive to hypoxia than to hypercapnia, and growing evidence suggests that the hypoxic stimulus is the principal stimulus for sympathoexcitation during episodes of apnoea. When breathing a hypoxic gas, these sympathoexcitatory responses occur in the face of a modulatory effect of associated increased ventilation responses (Somers et al. 1989a). Despite the significance of hypoxia as a chemoreflex-mediated stimulus for sympathoexcitation during apnoea, the concomitant hypercapnia and apnoea itself also contribute to this response (Somers et al. 1989b; Morgan et al. 1995; Tamisier et al. 2004). Hypercapnia and hypoxia are known to act synergistically to augment both ventilatory and sympathetic neural responses (Somers et al. 1989b).
Chemoreflex control in OSA. It is well documented that OSA is characterized by increased MSNA compared with baseline during acute bouts of hypoxia during wakefulness when subjects are breathing normally, and this abnormal response is independent of the ventilatory response (Hedner et al. 1992b; Leuenberger et al. 1995; Somers et al. 1995). In addition, it has been demonstrated that patients with sleep apnoea exhibit enhanced ventilatory and pressor responses to hypoxia when compared with normal subjects. Accumulating data suggest that the peripheral chemoreceptors (via sensitivity to hypoxia) are responsible for these augmented MSNA, pressor and ventilatory responses observed in OSA (Narkiewicz et al. 1999; Iturriaga et al. 2005). These data point to the hypoxia stimulus as the primary drive for these adapted responses in OSA patients; however, both the intermittent interruption of respiration and hypercapnia are also likely to contribute to this adaptation of the reflex, as noted above. Other studies further support the idea that chemoreceptor control of MSNA is exaggerated in patients with OSA. Leuenberger et al. (1995) studied OSA patients during episodes of hypoxia at night and observed marked increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Smith et al. (1996) reported that transient bouts of hypoxaemia provoked sympathetic stimulation in OSA patients during wakefulness, although the response was less than that observed during episodes of hypoxaemia during sleep. They also demonstrated that this response was greater in OSA patients than in non-OSA weight-matched control subjects.
The increased MSNA observed during sleep apnoeic events can be explained by the repetitive bouts of hypoxia, hypercapnia and apnoea. In contrast, the mechanism by which sympathetic outflow is increased in sleep apnoea patients during wakefulness remains to be elucidated. It has been postulated that tonic peripheral chemoreceptor activation contributes to the increased MSNA observed during wakefulness in this population (Narkiewicz et al. 1998; Cutler et al. 2004a). Moreover, several studies examining the effects of sustained and intermittent hypoxia in rats concluded that continuous exposure to hypoxia did not elicit an enhanced sensory response by the chemoreceptors, whereas intermittent hypoxia produced an enhanced chemosenstivity (Fletcher et al. 1992b; Fletcher, 2001; Peng et al. 2003; Peng & Prabhakar, 2004). The seminal studies of Fletcher and colleagues demonstrated that chronic intermittent hypoxia can lead to development of hypertension, and that this effect is prevented by denervation of the chemoreceptors (Fletcher et al. 1992a,,b). These results strongly suggest that in a rat model: (1) the intermittent nature of the stimulus is key to these pathology-induced changes; and (2) the chemoreceptors can mediate physiological changes resulting in hypertension. However, the relative contribution of intermittent versus sustained hypoxia to changes in autonomic function and the link between chemoreflex dysfunction and hypertension remain inconclusive in humans and merit further investigation.
Four studies addressed the hypothesis that short-term interventions akin to sleep apnoea can evoke an adaptation of chemoreflex control of MSNA. Morgan et al. (1996) and Xie et al. (2000) observed a sustained elevation of MSNA after 20 min of intermittent asphyxia (hypercapnic hypoxia). The basal MSNA remained elevated for at least 20 min after the asphyxic stimulus had subsided. Using a similar study design, Cutler et al. (2004a,b) demonstrated in healthy subjects that 20 min of intermittent hypoxia lead to sustained elevation in MSNA even after hypoxic bouts were terminated. These responses and the associated time course of adaptation were similar to 20 min of intermittent apnoea. Thus, they concluded that this prolonged elevation postconditioning stimulus was mediated by hypoxia and that the chemoreceptors played an integral role in this outcome. The fact that intermittent hypoxia or apnoea produces altered chemoreflex control of MSNA that is sustained well beyond the period of the intervention supports the hypothesis that impaired chemoreflex function may have long-term effects on haemodynamic control and thus, the risk of hypertension.
The hypothesis that chemoreflex input may contribute to the sustained elevation of MSNA during wakefulness implies that the chemoreceptors are tonically active during normal wakeful breathing. Studies in which the effect of hyperoxia on MSNA was assessed support this premise. Leuenberger et al. (1995) showed that breathing 100% oxygen produced a modest reduction in MSNA in OSA subjects, thereby suggesting that the chemoreflex was actively controlling MSNA even under normoxic conditions. Similarly, Narkiewicz et al. (1998) deactivated the chemoreflex by having subjects breathe 100% oxygen and found that MSNA was attenuated in obese subjects with OSA but not in obese subjects without OSA. In a preliminary study, we assessed the MSNA response to 60 s periods of gradations of hypoxia induced by an initial breath of nitrogen followed by an hypoxic gas mixture. In nine OSA patients, the mildest hypoxia (producing O2 saturations of 93 ± 1%) elicited a significant increase in MSNA (
28 ± 15%), whereas weight-matched control subjects without OSA showed no change in MSNA (
–6 ± 11%) with similar hypoxia (92 ± 1%). Collectively, these studies support the tenet that the chemoreflex control of MSNA is active under normoxic conditions in OSA patients, but is not in healthy control subjects.
Cardiovascular responses to hypoxia. Ultimately, if we are to determine a mechanistic link between OSA and hypertension, the link must involve net effects on the cardiovascular system. The changes in chemoreflex control of MSNA discussed above may be implicated; however, the question also remains whether those changes affect the determinants of arterial pressure, namely, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance. The majority of the literature offers data suggesting that pressor responses to hypoxia are exaggerated in subjects with OSA. Narkiewicz et al. (1999) found significant increases in heart rate, blood pressure and ventilation during hypoxic breathing in OSA patients compared with control subjects. In addition, the authors demonstrated that the MSNA response to hypoxia that is normally attenuated by the compensatory increases in heart rate, ventilation and blood pressure in healthy subjects was sustained in the OSA patients. Thus, the chemoreflex seems to be an important mediator in the exaggerated cardiovascular responses observed in this population (Narkiewicz et al. 1999). Narkiewicz et al. (1998) demonstrated that hyperoxic conditions decrease blood pressure in normoxic OSA patients but not in normal control subjects. The authors postulated that tonic activation of chemoreceptors could partly account for the increase in blood pressure, again consistent with the observations of chemoreflex control of MSNA noted above. Hedner et al. (1992a) demonstrated that OSA patients have an exaggerated pressor and ventilatory response to hypoxia compared with normal subjects, and that both responses were not different between normotensive and hypertensive OSA patients. These results suggest the possibility of greater peripheral chemosensitivity in the OSA patients; however, the reason for the lack of difference between normotensive and hypertensive OSA patients remains unclear. In addition, the authors found that ventilatory and pressor increases were positively correlated. These data suggest the presence of an excessive vasoconstriction mediated by the chemoreflex during hypoxia. The relationship between the ventilatory and pressor response is debatable. Not all OSA patients had high ventilatory responses that accompany a high pressor response; likewise, some normal control subjects with no pressor responses display exaggerated ventilatory responses (Hedner et al. 1992a). Beyond these studies, there is now growing evidence to suggest that vascular function is adversely impacted by OSA. These effects are discussed in the associated reviews in this themed issue (see Foster et al. and Weiss et al.).
The chemoreceptor reflex and hypertension
Evidence suggests that in humans with early and mild hypertension, sympathetic neural activity is increased (Trzebski et al. 1982; Anderson et al. 1989; Matsukawa et al. 1991; Floras & Hara, 1993; Grassi et al. 2000). In turn, it is hypothesized that this elevation of MSNA is causally related to the hypertension. One hypothesized mechanism by which this augmentation occurs involves altered peripheral chemoreceptor control of MSNA.
Carotid body morphology. Why might the chemoreflex contribute to development of hypertension? One reason could be that changes in the chemoreceptor structure may adversely impact upon receptor function. Morphological studies that examined the anatomical and vascular characteristics of the carotid bodies in hypertension disclosed another possible explanation for the augmented chemoreflex response observed in hypertension. Since the carotid bifurcation (Howe & Neil, 1972) is very susceptible to atherosclerosis (Friedman et al. 1975), several autopsy studies examined the arteries that feed into the carotid bodies in order to understand the possible relationship of carotid body pathology to hypertension. For example, Habeck et al. (1983), Habeck (1986), Przybylski & Trzebski (1980) and Przybylski (1981) observed atherosclerosis of the glomic arteries and thus a decreased blood flow to the carotid bodies of hypertensive subjects. Along these lines, Kluge (1985) examined the vascularization of dissected carotid bodies from deceased patients with hypertension. There was a significant difference in the vascularization of the carotid bodies between the hypertensives and the control group such that the patients with hypertension had a lower number of arteries supplying the carotid bodies. Kluge concluded that the difference in the number of arteries may be genetically determined and that the carotid bodies may play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension. It has been proposed that chronic ischaemia of the carotid bodies leads to chronic stimulation of the chemoreceptors and subsequent hypertrophy (Przybylski & Trzebski, 1980; Przybylski, 1981). Morphological studies suggest that there is in fact hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the carotid bodies in hypertensive humans. One study examined the histology of the carotid bodies in deceased cases with myocardial hypertrophy secondary to both systemic hypertension and hypoxaemia. The authors found a higher cell count, increased weight and a greater diameter of the carotid bodies in those with systemic hypertension (Smith et al. 1982). In a follow-up study, the authors conclude that the type of cell that proliferates and causes hyperplasia and hypertrophy is the elongated sustentacular type II cell (Heath et al. 1982). Taken together, these findings suggest an important relationship between abnormalities of the carotid bodies and systemic hypertension. However, caution is warranted when interpreting any results from morphological studies of the carotid bodies because it is likely that the subjects suffered from several diseases; thus it is difficult to characterize the relationship between the anatomical changes found in the carotid bodies and systemic hypertension independent of important systemic vascular abnormalities, cardiac disease and other comorbidities. Whether hypertension precedes carotid body ischaemia and hyperplasia or whether in fact ischaemia, chronic stimulation and subsequent hyperplasia of the carotid bodies causes hypertension remains unclear. These changes are likely not to be the principal cause in many aetiologies of essential hypertension, but may be contributory to the facilitation of disease progression.
Chemoreflex resetting and chemoreceptor hyperactivity. Data that demonstrate the role of chemoreflex dysfunction in OSA and its association with the development of systemic hypertension have only recently been uncovered and are limited at best. Nevertheless, several human studies have attempted to clarify this association. As postulated above, an increased chemoreflex gain and threshold for activation of MSNA supports the view that the chemoreflex may contribute to chronic elevation of MSNA. Two other possibilities that have been proposed are chemoreflex resetting and chemoreflex hyperactivity.
First, although not extensively researched, the concept of chemoreflex resetting has been postulated by few researchers and warrants evaluation. Hedner et al. (1992a) suggested that as a result of chronic episodic hypoxia, the chemoreflex may reset to a higher level. Trzebski (1992) hypothesized that recurrent apnoeas as seen in OSA reset the chemoreflex to a higher level, thus increasing sympathetic outflow during normoxia or mild hypoxia and initiating hypertension. Tafil-Klawe et al. (1991) found a decrease in ventilation after inactivation of the carotid chemoreceptors in hypertensive OSA patients, thus indicating an increase in resting peripheral chemoreceptor drive in this population. Although these studies are limited, there is the suggestion that a process of resetting may also occur with sleep apnoea (Garcia-Rio et al. 2000). Whether this occurs in the chemoreflex control of MSNA remains to be determined, and this hypothesis needs further investigation.
Second, as mentioned earlier, patients with OSA exhibit elevated MSNA and catecholamine levels during wakefulness, which may result in part from the hyperactivity of the chemoreceptors. Loredo et al. (2001) found that hypertensive OSA patients had higher tonic chemoreceptor activity than OSA normotensives. They concluded that tonic chemoreceptor activity has some role in the development of systemic hypertension in OSA patients. The mechanism that would lead to a chronic hyperactivity of the chemoreceptors is unknown, and this outcome could be a manifestation of resetting and/or a change in the threshold or gain of the control system.
Conclusion
It is well established that there is a link between OSA and hypertension; however, the physiological mechanism(s) explaining this relationship remains unclear. A growing body of evidence supports the premise that a chemoreflex-mediated elevation of basal sympathetic activity may play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension among OSA patients. A chronic elevation of sympathetic activity would logically lead to vascular remodelling and sustained changes in vascular reactivity and tone, which are hallmark manifestations of essential hypertension. Nevertheless, further investigation into these potential links and mechanisms are needed, and many are addressed in the accompanying review papers in this journal.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cutler MJ, Swift NM, Keller DM, Wasmund WL, Burk JR & Smith ML (2004a). Periods of intermittent hypoxic apnea can alter chemoreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287, H2054–H2060.
Cutler MJ, Swift NM, Keller DM, Wasmund WL & Smith ML (2004b). Hypoxia-mediated prolonged elevation of sympathetic nerve activity after periods of intermittent hypoxic apnea. J Appl Physiol 96, 754–761.
Fletcher EC (2001). Invited review: Physiological consequences of intermittent hypoxia: systemic blood pressure. J Appl Physiol 90, 1600–1605.
Fletcher EC, Lesske J, Culman J, Miller CC & Unger T (1992a). Sympathetic denervation blocks blood pressure elevation in episodic hypoxia. Hypertension 20, 612–619.
Fletcher EC, Lesske J, Qian W, Miller CC III & Unger T (1992b). Repetitive, episodic hypoxia causes diurnal elevation of blood pressure in rats. Hypertension 19, 555–561.
Fletcher EC, Miller J, Schaaf JW & Fletcher JG (1987). Urinary catecholamines before and after tracheostomy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension. Sleep 10, 35–44.[Medline]
Floras JS & Hara K (1993). Sympathoneural and haemodynamic characteristics of young subjects with mild essential hypertension. J Hypertens 11, 647–655.[CrossRef][Medline]
Foster GE, Poulin MJ & Hanly PJ (2007). Intermittent hypoxia and vascular function: implications for obstructive sleep apnoea. Exp Physiol 92, 51–65.
Friedman M, O'Brien V & Ehrlich LW (1975). Calculations of pulsatile flow through a branch: implications for the hemodynamics of atherogenesis. Circ Res 36, 277–285.
Garcia-Rio F, Racionero MA, Pino JM, Martinez I, Ortuno F, Villasante C & Villamor J (2000). Sleep apnea and hypertension. Chest 117, 1417–1425.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grassi G, Seravalle G, Bertinieri G, Turri C, Dell'Oro R, Stella ML & Mancia G (2000). Sympathetic and reflex alterations in systo-diastolic and systolic hypertension of the elderly. J Hypertens 18, 587–593.[Medline]
Habeck JO (1986). Morphological findings at the carotid bodies of humans suffering from different types of systemic hypertension or severe lung diseases. Anat Anz 162, 17–27.[Medline]
Habeck JO, Waller H & Protze J (1983). Pathological alterations of the arterial vessels of the carotid bodies in hypertensive humans. Dt Gesundh Wesen 38, 1970–1972.
Heath D, Smith P & Jago R (1982). Hyperplasia of the carotid body. J Pathol 138, 115–127.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hedner JA, Wilcox I, Laks L, Grunstein RR & Sullivan CE (1992a). A specific and potent pressor effect of hypoxia in patients with sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 146, 1240–1245.[Medline]
Hedner JA, Ejnell H, Sellgren J, Hedner T & Wallin G (1988). Is high and fluctuating muscle nerve sympathetic activity in the sleep apnoea syndrome of pathogenetic importance for the development of hypertension? J Hypertens Suppl 6, 5529–5531.
Howe A & Neil E (1972). Arterial chemoreceptors. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, ed. Neil E, pp. 47–80. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Iturriaga R, Rey S & Del Rio R (2005). Cardiovascular and ventilatory acclimatization induced by chronic intermittent hypoxia: a role for the carotid body in the pathophysiology of sleep apnea. Biol Res 38, 335–340.[Medline]
Kluge P (1985). Vascularization and morphology of carotid bodies in patients with essential hypertension. Acta Physiol Pol 36, 76–82.[Medline]
Leuenberger U, Jacob E, Sweer L, Waravdekar N, Zwillich C & Sinoway L (1995). Surges of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during obstructive apnea are linked to hypoxemia. J Appl Physiol 79, 581–588.
Leuenberger UA, Brubaker D, Quraishi S, Hogeman CS, Imadojemu VA & Gray KS (2005). Effects of intermittent hypoxia on sympathetic activity and blood pressure in humans. Auton Neurosci 121, 87–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
Loredo JS, Clausen JL, Nelesen RA, Ancoli-Israel S, Ziegler MG & Dimsdale JE (2001). Obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension: are peripheral chemoreceptors involved? Med Hypotheses 56, 17–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
Marrone O, Riccobono L, Salvaggio A, Mirabella A, Bonanno A & Bonsignore MR (1993). Catecholamines and blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 103, 722–727.[CrossRef][Medline]
Matsukawa T, Gotoh E, Uneda S, Miyajima E, Shionoiri H, Tochikubo O & Ishii M (1991). Augmented sympathetic nerve activity in response to stressors in young borderline hypertensive men. Acta Physiol Scand 141, 157–165.[Medline]
Morgan BJ (1996). Acute and chronic cardiovascular responses to sleep disordered breathing. Sleep 19, S206–S209.[Medline]
Morgan BJ, Crabtree DC, Palta M & Skatrud JB (1995). Combined hypoxia and hypercapnia evokes long-lasting sympathetic activation in humans. J Appl Physiol 79, 205–213.
Narkiewicz K & Somers VK (1997). The sympathetic nervous system and obstructive sleep apnea: implications for hypertension. J Hypertens 15, 1613–1619.[CrossRef][Medline]
Narkiewicz K, van de Borne PJ, Montano N, Dyken ME, Phillips BG & Somers VK (1998). Contribution of tonic chemoreflex activation to sympathetic activity and blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Circulation 97, 943–945.
Narkiewicz K, van de Borne PJ, Pesek CA, Dyken ME, Montano N & Somers VK (1999). Selective potentiation of peripheral chemoreflex sensitivity in obstructive sleep apnea. Circulation 99, 1183–1189.
Peng YJ, Overholt JL, Kline D, Kumar GK & Prabhakar NR (2003). Induction of sensory long-term facilitation in the carotid body by intermittent hypoxia: implications for recurrent apneas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 10073–10078.
Peng YJ & Prabhakar NR (2004). Effect of two paradigms of chronic intermittent hypoxia on carotid body sensory activity. J Appl Physiol 96, 1236–1242.
Peppard PE, Young T, Palta M & Skatrud J (2000). Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension. N Engl J Med 342, 1378–1384.
Przybylski J (1981). Do arterial chemoreceptors play a role in the pathogenesis of hypertension? Med Hypotheses 7, 127–131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Przybylski J & Trzebski A (1980). Hyperactivity of the arterial chemoreflex as a factor in the mechanism of early spontaneous hypertension. Fed Proc 39, 1186.
Saito M, Mano T, Iwase S, Koga K, Abe H & Yamazaki Y (1988). Responses in muscle sympathetic activity to acute hypoxia in humans. J Appl Physiol 65, 1548–1552.
Shoemaker JK, Vovk A & Cunningham DA (2002). Peripheral chemoreceptor contributions to sympathetic and cardiovascular responses during hypercapnia. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 80, 1136–1144.[CrossRef][Medline]
Smith P, Jago R & Heath D (1982). Anatomical variation and quantitative histology of the normal and enlarged carotid body. J Pathol 137, 287–304.[CrossRef][Medline]
Smith ML, Niedermaier ON, Hardy SM, Decker MJ & Strohl KP (1996). Role of hypoxemia in sleep apnea-induced sympathoexcitation. J Auton Nerv Syst 56, 184–190.[CrossRef][Medline]
Somers VK, Dyken ME, Clary MP & Abboud FM (1995). Sympathetic neural mechanisms in obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Invest 96, 1897–1904.[Medline]
Somers VK, Mark AL, Zavala DC & Abboud FM (1989a). Influence of ventilation and hypocapnia on sympathetic nerve responses to hypoxia in normal humans. J Appl Physiol 67, 2095–2100.
Somers VK, Mark AL, Zavala DC & Abboud FM (1989b). Contrasting effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia on ventilation and sympathetic activity in humans. J Appl Physiol 67, 2101–2106.
Tafil-Klawe M, Thiele AE, Raschke F, Mayer J, Peter JH & von Wichert W (1991). Peripheral chemoreceptor reflex in obstructive sleep apnea patients; a relationship between ventilatory response to hypoxia and nocturnal bradycardia during apnea events. Pneumologie 45 (Suppl. 1), 309–311.[Medline]
Tamisier R, Nieto L, Anand A, Cunnington D & Weiss JW (2004). Sustained muscle sympathetic activity after hypercapnic but not hypocapnic hypoxia in normal humans. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 141, 145–155.[CrossRef][Medline]
Trzebski A (1992). Arterial chemoreceptor reflex and hypertension. Hypertension 19, 562–566.
Trzebski A, Tafil M, Zoltowski M & Przybylski J (1982). Increased sensitivity of the arterial chemoreceptor drive in young men with mild hypertension. Cardiovasc Res 16, 163–172.[Medline]
Weiss JW, Liu MD & Huang J (2007). Physiological basis for a causal relationship of human obstructive sleep apnoea to hypertension. J Physiol 92, 21–26.
Xie A, Skatrud JB, Crabtree DC, Puleo DS, Goodman BM & Morgan BJ (2000). Neurocirculatory consequences of intermittent asphyxia in humans. J Appl Physiol 89, 1333–1339.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. W. Bavis and G. S. Mitchell Long-term effects of the perinatal environment on respiratory control J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 1220 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fournier, M. Allard, R. Gulemetova, V. Joseph, and R. Kinkead Chronic corticosterone elevation and sex-specific augmentation of the hypoxic ventilatory response in awake rats J. Physiol., November 1, 2007; 584(3): 951 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-E. Genest, N. Balon, S. Laforest, G. Drolet, and R. Kinkead Neonatal maternal separation and enhancement of the hypoxic ventilatory response in rat: the role of GABAergic modulation within the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus J. Physiol., August 15, 2007; 583(1): 299 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Schultz, Y. L. Li, and Y. Ding Arterial Chemoreceptors and Sympathetic Nerve Activity: Implications for Hypertension and Heart Failure Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 6 - 13. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Smith Sleep Apnoea and Hypertension: Physiological Bases for a Causal Relation Themed Issue Exp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 92(1): 19 - 20. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |