Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 92.2 pp 347-355
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.034363
© The Physiological Society 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/2/347    most recent
expphysiol.2006.034363v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whipp, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whipp, B. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Symposia Papers

Symposium Reports

Muscle-energetic and cardio-pulmonary determinants of exercise tolerance in humans

Physiological mechanisms dissociating pulmonary CO2 and O2 exchange dynamics during exercise in humans

Brian J. Whipp1

1 Institute of Membrane and Systems Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Abstract

During moderate exercise (below the lactate threshold, {theta}L), muscle CO2 production (Formula ) kinetics are monoexponential, with a time constant ({tau}) similar to that of O2 consumption. Following a delay incorporating the muscle–lung vascular transit time, Formula is expressed at the lungs (Formula ) with an appreciably longer {tau}, reflecting the influence of intervening high-capacitance CO2 stores. Above {theta}L, Formula kinetics become complex, resulting from the conflation of the differing rates of HCO3 breakdown and degrees of compensatory hyperventilation with that of the underlying aerobic component. During incremental exercise, the increased rate of Formula relative to pulmonary O2 uptake (Formula ) can be used to quantify {theta}L validly if aerobic and hyperventilatory sources can be ruled out, i.e. {theta}L is then attributable to the decrease in muscle and blood [HCO3]. In many cases, however, very rapid incrementation of work rate and/or prior depletion of CO2 stores (by volitional or anticipatory hyperventilation) can yield a ‘false positive’ non-invasive estimation of {theta}L (‘pseudo-threshold’) resulting from a slowing of the rate of wash-in of transient CO2 stores.

(Received 28 November 2006; accepted after revision 13 December 2006; first published online 21 December 2006)
Corresponding author B. J. Whipp: Institute of Membrane and Systems Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Email: b.whipp{at}leeds.ac.uk

During the non-steady state of muscular exercise, the tissue capacitance of the blood and skeletal muscle (i.e. the change in the amount of gas loaded into or released from the tissue of interest per unit change in its partial pressure) dissociates the pulmonary gas exchange transients from those of the muscle metabolic changes. Since the tissue capacitance for CO2 is appreciably greater than for O2 (Farhi & Rahn, 1955), this means that the respiratory exchange ratio (R), i.e. the ratio of the volumes of CO2 and O2 exchanged across the tissue of interest per unit time, will differ from that of the respiratory quotient (RQ), i.e. the ratio of the amounts of metabolic CO2 and O2 produced and consumed, respectively, by the tissue per unit time not only across the lung, where it is most typically determined and from which inferences are most typically drawn, but also across the muscle vascular bed itself. For example, the normal CO2 capacitance of blood, evidenced by the slope of its dissociation curve over the region of interest, is severalfold greater than that for O2 (Piiper, 1965). But, in addition, skeletal muscle contraction results in a transient metabolic alkalosis in the force-generating units (Steinhagen et al. 1976; Kemp, 2005) and in the venous effluent of the exercising muscle (Wasserman et al. 1997) as a result of the net proton (H+) trapping associated with the high-energy phosphate utilization, i.e. H+ release as ATP is split, and H+ uptake consequent to phosphocreatine (PCr) splitting (Kushmerick, 1997). The proton trapping during the PCr-related regeneration of ATP is given by:


Formula 1

(1)
with {gamma}, the proton-trapping quantifier based on the charge difference between PCr and inorganic phosphate (Pi), having a value slightly less than 0.5 at muscle pH (Kemp, 2005). This transient alkalosis therefore results in a component of the metabolically produced CO2 being retained within the muscle.

Constant work-rate exercise

Moderate intensity.  Below the lactate threshold ({theta}L), the time course of pulmonary CO2 output (Formula ) relative to that of O2 uptake (Formula ) during the non-steady-state phase of a constant work-rate (WR) test is consequently slow, in that Formula normally increases in healthy young subjects with a time constant ({tau}) of ~30–40 s while Formula is ~50–60 s (Fig. 1). Ventilation (Formula ) changes marginally more slowly (Formula ~55–65 s; Fig. 1). Consequently, since Formula is appreciably longer than Formula , the alveolar and arterial partial pressures of O2 (Formula and Formula , respectively) fall transiently (Fig. 1). But, owing to the relatively small kinetic dissociation between Formula and Formula , the transient arterial Formula (Formula ) increase is only a millimetre of mercury or so (see Whipp & Ward, 1981, for discussion).


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1.  Schematic representation of time course of O2 uptake ( Figure 1 , – · –), CO2 output ( Figure 1 ; · · · ·) and ventilation ( Figure 1 ; ———) in response to moderate constant-load exercise from rest (top) and unloaded pedaling (middle), with corresponding profiles of arterial Figure 1 and Figure 1 (Figure 1 ; – · · –) (bottom).
From Whipp & Ward (1981), with permission.

 
The difference between Formula and Formula is evident for the first of the two-step, constant-WR challenge shown in Fig. 2 (Brittain et al. 2001), and accounts for R being reduced below the RQ during the on-transient non-steady state and also for R being ‘out of phase’ with Formula and Formula during moderate-intensity sinusoidal exercise (Casaburi et al. 1977). At the off-transient of such a test, the stored CO2 is released, leading to R being increased above the RQ until the new steady state is attained. Note, however, that the degree of dissociation between Formula and Formula during the on-transient of the higher, but equal WR increment, step is appreciably less (Hughson & Morrissey, 1982; Whipp & Ward, 1991; Fig. 2). The Formula time course is slowed slightly, despite the WR still being within the moderate-intensity domain, as originally demonstrated by Hughson & Morrissey (1982); this is thought to reflect the recruitment of an altered fibre-type pool (Brittain et al. 2001). In contrast, the Formula time course is appreciably speeded both in absolute terms and relative to that of Formula , presumably because the muscle CO2 capacitance is already partly charged at the onset of the higher WR bout; this accounts for the markedly reduced decrease of R during the higher transient (see Whipp & Ward, 1991, for discussion).


Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2.  Schematic representation of time course of O2 uptake Figure 2 and CO2 output Figure 2 in response to a moderate, two-step exercise protocol (i.e. two consequtive, equal work-rate increments, from unloaded pedalling)
Left panel, responses over the duration of entire test. Right panel, superimposed Figure 2 and Figure 2 responses normalised to the corresponding steady-state increments, for the first step (bottom) and second step (top), with mono-exponential model fits superimposed [—; after a delay accounting for the initial ‘cardiodynamic’ phase]. Note that, relative to Figure 2 is faster on the second higher step than on the first step; see text for details. Modified from Brittain et al. (2001), with permission.

 
Heavy and very heavy intensities.  Above {theta}L, the components of the Formula kinetics are more complex, reflecting in addition: (a) the translation of the non-linear Formula ‘slow component’ into a corresponding Formula response; (b) production of supplemental CO2 from the rate (rather than the amount) at which muscle and blood [bicarbonate] ([HCO3]) decrease consequent to buffering of the H+ associated with the [lactate] ([L]) increase; and (c) the time course of the compensatory hyperventilation for the metabolic acidosis. At WRs during which Formula and arterial [L] ([L]a) and [H+] ([H+]a) increase continuously to the limit of tolerance (i.e. very heavy intensity), Formula kinetics often have a monoexponential-like appearance (Casaburi et al. 1989; Stringer et al. 1995; Özyener et al. 2002; Fig. 3A). Interestingly, no Formula ‘slow phase’ is evident, despite this being clearly discernible in Formula . This apparent steady-state-like behaviour of Formula , however, should not be considered reflective of simple-compartment dynamics. Rather, the Formula profile conflates the offsetting influences of the slowing of the rate of [HCO3] decrease and the delayed onset of the progressive hyperventilatory decline in Formula (Sun et al. 2001) with that of the underlying aerobic component (Fig. 3B).


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3.  Time course of CO2 output Figure 3 in response to supra-threshold constant-load exercise
Left panel, representative Figure 3 ({circ}) and Figure 3 (•) responses; note the more rapid Figure 3 response, relative to Figure 3. Modified from Stringer et al. (1995) with permission. Right panel, schematic of the contributions to the total Figure 3 response (top) and arterial [bicarbonate] (bottom) to supra-threshold constant-load exercise. See text for further detail.

 
However, for WRs at which Formula , [L]a and [H+]a can be stabilized at constant, although elevated, levels (i.e. heavy-intensity exercise), the Formula profile often evidences an overshoot before subsequently stabilizing (Özyener et al. 2002). This reflects the influence of the rapidly falling phase of [HCO3] (Stringer et al. 1995), but with little or no early recruitment of compensatory hyperventilation (Özyener et al. 2002). The Formula is typically slightly elevated (e.g. 3–4 mmHg) during the initial on-transient phase at this intensity, as a result of the kinetics of respiratory compensation for the acidosis being long (Rausch et al. 1991), presumably owing to the relatively slow carotid-body chemoreceptor responsiveness to [H+]a compared to that of Formula (Buckler et al. 1991).

Incremental exercise

The changes in the blood and muscle CO2 stores wrought by the increase in L-associated protons during the heavy- and very heavy-intensity phases of ramp-type incremental exercise provide the basis for the non-invasive estimation of {theta}L. The protons are exposed to a pool of buffers, including protein-linked histidine residues, Pi and HCO3 (predominantly as potassium bicarbonate in cytoplasm and sodium bicarbonate in plasma), that constrain the acidaemia resulting from the acidosis. All the buffers are involved, but to varying degrees. In fact, the initial 0.3–0.5 mM of the [L] increase is dominated by buffers other than HCO3 (Visser et al. 1964; Wasserman, 1994). Bicarbonate, however, is ‘special’ in this context, because it is part of an ‘open system’ subserving more than 90% of the buffering (Visser et al. 1964; Wasserman, 1994):


Formula 2

(2)
with each HCO3 and H+ ion ‘lost’ yielding one CO2 molecule, i.e. ~22.26 ml of additional CO2 is produced from each milliequivalent decrease of [HCO3]. As [H+] increases, [HCO3] falls, with an increase in CO2 production rate in, and from, the contracting muscle units as a necessary consequence. This results in an obligatory increase in CO2 output from the muscle and, subsequently, from the lung. The temporal dissociation between these variables is also manifest in the delay between muscle O2 consumption and Formula at the lung. This is the basis for characterizing the onset of the metabolic acidosis, as estimated from pulmonary gas exchange, as a metabolic rate (Formula ) rather than a work rate. That is, the WR continues to increase during this delay in an incremental test, by an amount that is incrementation-rate dependent.

The extra-aerobic CO2 formed in these ‘anaerobic’ reactions is quantitatively large: a ~2.5-fold local increase in Formula (and a ~12.5-fold increase in glycogen utilization rate; Whipp & Ward, 1991). It is this that makes Formula analysis, as a function of Formula (Fig. 4), such a good functional index of the onset of the metabolic acidosis (Beaver et al. 1986; Whipp et al. 1986).


Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4.  Responses to a 1 min incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer in a normal young subject of: Figure 4 , [lactate]a, [HCO3]a and arterial pH
The ‘isocapnic buffering’ phase is depicted by the interval between the lactate threshold ({theta}L) and the respiratory compensation point (RCP). From Wasserman et al. (2004; p. 34), with permission.

 
Note, however, that the extra amount of CO2 produced (i.e. Formula ) under these conditions is a function of the amount of [HCO3] decrease in blood and muscle compartments. Any contribution from non-HCO3 buffering mechanisms, while important for [H+] regulation, does not produce extra CO2. The rate at which extra CO2 is produced from these reactions (i.e. Formula ) is a function of the rate at which [HCO3] falls, not the amount of the decrease. Consequently, the more rapid the rate of [L] increase, the greater is the increase in the pulmonary CO2 exchange rate. This accounts for both Formula and R being appreciably higher at a given Formula in the period of increasing [L]a during rapid-incremental exercise, compared with tests where the WR incrementation rate is relatively slow (Whipp & Mahler, 1980; Ward & Whipp, 1992; Scheuermann & Kowalchuk, 1998). In contrast, the amount of CO2 produced during a slowly incrementing test is severalfold greater than that for a rapidly incremental test (Ward & Whipp, 1992) as a result of the CO2 unloading consequent to the progressive arterial hypocapnia that provides the respiratory compensation for the metabolic acidosis.

Consequently, after the early kinetic phase, the relationship between Formula and Formula during an incremental test (which is termed the V-slope) is characterized by a relatively linear relationship over the moderate-intensity range, a region termed S1 (Beaver et al. 1986). This is followed by an increased slope (S2) within the ‘isocapnic buffering’ phase that extends up to the ‘respiratory compensation point’ (i.e. a region characterized by a lack of end-tidal Formula (Formula ) decrease; Wasserman et al. 1973; Whipp et al. 1989; Fig. 4). The intersection of these two linear phases has been shown to agree closely with the onset of increase in [L]a and the [L]a/[pyruvate]a ratio and decrease in [HCO3]a (Beaver et al. 1986; Fig. 4) and, in those cases in which there is no sufficiently linear S2 region, the acceleration of Formula relative to Formula can be used as the {theta}L estimator.

However, in order to appropriately subserve its role in {theta}L discrimination, Formula must not simply increase more rapidly during the phase of increasing blood and muscle [L] but must do so such that the discernibly additional CO2 is of HCO3 origin. That is, hyperventilation (by definition, a reduction in Formula ) must be ruled out as the cause. This can be convincingly justified using ventilatory and pulmonary gas exchange criteria (Whipp et al. 1986; Wasserman, 1994). This is based on mass balance considerations, in that Formula can only be regulated if there is a precise proportional relationship between the ventilatory equivalent for CO2 (Formula ) and the physiological dead space fraction of the breath (VD/VT):


Formula 3

(3)

The decrease in Formula over the early regions of an incremental test ‘matches’ the decrease in VD/VT (except for a small kinetic dissociation between Formula and Formula , which leads to Formula being increased by a millimetre of mercury or so during the non-steady-state phase). Also, while VD actually increases as VT increases, this increase is small compared with the change in total lung volume. However, since VD/VT has usually decreased to, or close to, its minimum value at {theta}L, hyperventilation requires Formula to increase or to decrease at a slower rate. For ‘standard’ ramp-incremental exercise, i.e. exercise designed to last ~10 min (see Wasserman et al. 2004, for discussion), this rarely occurs until a much higher WR; how ‘much’ depends on the WR incrementation rate. Consequently, the relatively constancy (Fig. 4), or even a small continued decrease, of Formula over this range rules out hyperventilation as the cause of the increased Formula slope. The stability of Formula (isocapnic buffering) supports this contention. However, for more prolonged incremental tests, the extent of the isocapnic buffering region is reduced or even abolished as the slow carotid-body responsiveness to [H+] has time to be expressed (Buckler et al. 1991; Rausch et al. 1991).

Avoiding a pseudo-lactate threshold

The Formula can begin to increase at a discernibly greater rate during exercise, not simply because CO2 begins to be produced at a faster rate but also because its storage rate begins to slow, or stops. For example, during the non-steady-state phase of a moderate constant-WR test, the slowing of the transient CO2 storage causes R to stop decreasing and subsequently to increase to, or towards, its steady-state value at which it again equals the metabolic RQ. Similarly, during an incremental test in which the WR increases very rapidly, the transient CO2 storage can be considerable, leading to an unusually low S1 slope (Ward & Whipp, 1992; Fig. 5). The subsequent reduction in CO2 storage rate leads to an increase in the rate of Formula relative to that of Formula , with a new S2 slope that, of itself, would be suggestive of the onset of a lactic acidosis (Fig. 5). But the unusually low S1 slope and falling R at the time of the transition distinguish it from the conventional gas-exchange profile indicative of the onset of a lactic acidosis (Fig. 5).


Figure 5
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5.  Representative responses to rapidly increasing, ramp-incremental exercise performed to the limit of tolerance of: Figure 5 , R and arterialized-venous [lactate] versus Figure 5
Note that a psuedo-threshold ({psi}L) was evident, occurring at a lower Figure 5 than the directly estimated lactate threshold ({theta}L). From Ward & Whipp (1992), with permission.

 
To investigate this further, Ozcelik et al. (1999) amplified the magnitude of this transient CO2 storage by having subjects undergo a period of volitional hyperventilation (sufficiently long to allow R to return to, or close to normal) during the unloaded cycling phase of an incremental test. The hyperventilation was terminated at the onset of the incremental phase of the test. While there was no difference in either maximum WR or peak Formula between the control and the prior-hyperventilation tests, the Formula response as a function of Formula could, in each subject, be characterized by two linear phases, but with an S1 slope during the prior-hyperventilation test that was appreciably lower than control and with a subsequent S2 slope that did not differ from control (Fig. 6). The observation that Formula kinetics were slowed during the early phase of the posthyperventilatory ramp is not surprising. The surprising point is that the Formula slope from the S1–S2 transition to the actual {theta}L appeared to be no different from the Formula slope above {theta}L (Fig. 6); this was the case in all of the subjects. Also, in each case, the S1–S2 transition occurred before the onset of the lactic acidosis (e.g. Fig. 6) and in concert with the minimum of the decrease of R. As the ventilatory and pulmonary gas-exchange responses met the currently conventional criteria for estimating {theta}L (Wasserman, 1994; Whipp et al. 1986), we termed this a pseudo-lactate threshold. Note, however, that the ratio of the baseline-phase R (R0) to S1 slope (i.e. R0/S1) was appreciably greater than that for the pseudo-threshold test, whereas it was consistently less than that for the control test, in which the pulmonary gas-exchange criteria provided a valid estimation of {theta}L.


Figure 6
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6.  Representative responses to a ramp-incremental exercise test performed to the limit of tolerance (as a function of Figure 6 )
The responses shown are: Figure 6with continuous line showing best-fit S1 slope and vertical dashed line the lactate threshold; arterial [lactate] ([L]); and standard [bicarbonate] (Std [HCO3]). A, control; B, posthyperventilation. The asterisk denotes the directly measured lactate threshold for the posthyperventilation test. From Ozcelik et al. (1999), with permission.

 
It might be reasonable to challenge, however, that a bout of volitional hyperventilation that is abruptly terminated at the start of the incremental phase of the test is hardly physiological. However, of course, it is not uncommon for subjects to spontaneously undergo a bout of hyperventilation prior to, in the control phase or early in an exercise test which then subsides as the WR increases. Figure 7 provides just such an example. Note that, in this case, all the evidence consistent with pseudo-threshold behaviour is present: R0 high; S1 very low; R0/S1 consequently appreciably greater than one; and R still in the falling phase at the V-slope transition. However, this pseudo-threshold behaviour is not seen in all cases during an incremental ramp following transient spontaneous hyperventilation. This presumably depends on the magnitude and duration of the prior CO2 stores unloading and the subject's chemosensitivity to CO2.


Figure 7
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7.  Representative responses to a ramp-incremental exercise test performed to the limit of tolerance
Responses are shown for: Figure 7 (•) and heart rate (HR; {circ}) versusFigure 7, with best-fit S1 and S2 slopes (continuous lines) (top left); respiratory exchange ratio (RER) versus time (bottom left); Figure 7 (•) and Figure 7 ({circ}) versus time (top right); and end-tidal Figure 7 (Figure 7; •) and end-tidal Figure 7{circ}) versus time (bottom right). From J. Porszasz and R. Casaburi (unpublished observations), with permission.

 
A low S1 slope during the early phase of an incremental test is not, however, of itself indicative of pseudo-threshold behaviour. For example, when S1 is low as a result of prior glycogen depletion, as demonstrated in Fig. 8A from the work of Cooper et al. (1992), {theta}L was properly estimated, since there was no unusually large CO2 wash-in to a recently, partly depleted CO2 store during the transient. In this case, therefore, R0/S1 is normal, since both R0 and S1 are low as a result of the glycogen depletion. By the same token, a low baseline-phase Formula is also not, of itself, a concern in this regard. As shown in Fig. 8B, subjects who manifest chronic stable hyperventilation, i.e. with low Formula but with normal arterial pH (Jack et al. 2004), can regulate Formula at its low but stable value during incremental exercise rather than Formula increasing to re-establish a normal arterial pH, as occurs in the period following acute hyperventilation; R0/S1 is consequently normal.


Figure 8
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8.  Representative responses to ramp-incremental exercise performed to the limit of tolerance
A, response of Figure 8versusFigure 8, with best-fit S1 and S2 slopes (dashed lines) and values with estimated lactate threshold (Figure 8, vertical arrow) for control (top), glycogen depletion (middle) and glycogen repletion (bottom). From Cooper et al. (1992), with permission. B, responses as a function of Figure 8, in a chronically hyperventilating subject. From bottom to top: Figure 8 ({circ}) and Figure 8 (•), Figure 8 ({circ}) and Figure 8 (•), and Figure 8 with best-fit S1 slope (dashed line) with estimated lactate threshold ({theta}L, vertical line). Modified from Jack et al. (2004), with permission.

 
Since the lactate threshold, estimated from pulmonary gas-exchange indices, is currently used for assessing the normalcy (or otherwise) of a subject's integrative systemic function (Wasserman et al. 2004), optimizing the intensity of training WRs (Casaburi et al. 1991), judging a subject's appropriateness to undergo major thoracic or abdominal surgery (Older et al. 1993), triaging a postoperative patient to ‘the ward’ or to an intensive care facility (Older et al. 1999) and as an index of life expectancy in patients with heart disease (Gitt et al. 2002), it would seem judicious to add the R0/S1 index to the criteria used to ensure that the pulmonary gas-exchange indices do, in fact, provide a valid estimate of this important parameter. Naturally, finer discrimination of R0/S1 is needed than simply to state that if R0/S1 is ‘appreciably greater than 1.0’, it suggests pseudo-, rather than valid, estimation of the lactate threshold. However, this must await additional studies designed to explore further the effects of altered tissue capacitance on gas exchange transients during exercise.

References

Beaver WL, Wasserman K & Whipp BJ (1986). A new method for detecting the anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 60, 2020–2027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brittain CJ, Rossiter HB, Kowalchuk JM & Whipp BJ (2001). Effect of prior metabolic rate on the kinetics of oxygen uptake during moderate-intensity exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 86, 125–134.[CrossRef][Medline]

Buckler KJ, Vaughan-Jones RD, Peers C, Lagadicgossmann D & Nye PCG (1991). Effects of extracellular pH, Formula and HCO3 on intracellular pH in isolated type-I cells of the neonatal rat carotid body. J Physiol 444, 703–721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Casaburi R, Barstow TJ, Robinson T & Wasserman K (1989). Influence of work rate on ventilatory and gas exchange kinetics. J Appl Physiol 67, 547–555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Casaburi R, Patessio A, Ioli F, Zanaboni S, Donner CF & Wasserman K (1991). Reductions in exercise lactic acidosis and ventilation as a result of exercise training in patients with obstructive lung disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 143, 9–18.[Medline]

Casaburi R, Whipp BJ, Wasserman K, Beaver WL & Koyal SN (1977). Ventilatory and gas exchange dynamics in response to sinusoidal work. J Appl Physiol 42, 300–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cooper CB, Beaver WL, Cooper DM & Wasserman K (1992). Factors affecting components of the alveolar CO2 output–O2 uptake relationship during incremental exercise in man. Exp Physiol 77, 51–64.[Abstract]

Farhi LE & Rahn H (1955). Gas stores in the body and the unsteady state. J Appl Physiol 7, 472–484.[Free Full Text]

Gitt A, Wasserman K, Kilkowski C, Kleemann T, Kilkowski A, Bangert M, Schneider S, Schwartz A & Senges J (2002). Exercise anaerobic threshold and ventilatory efficiency identify heart failure patients for high risk of early death. Circulation 106, 3079–3084.

Hughson RL & Morrissey M (1982). Delayed kinetics of respiratory gas exchange in the transition from prior exercise. J Appl Physiol 52, 921–929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jack S, Rossiter HB, Pearson MG, Ward SA, Warburton CJ & Whipp BJ (2004). Ventilatory responses to CO2 inhalation, hypoxia and exercise in idiopathic hyperventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170, 118–125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kemp G (2005). Lactate accumulation, proton buffering and pH change in ischemically exercising muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289, R895–R901.[Free Full Text]

Kushmerick MJ (1997). Multiple equilibria of cations with metabolites in muscle bioenergetics. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 272, C1739–C1747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Older P, Hall A & Hader R (1999). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly. Chest 116, 355–362.

Older P, Smith R, Courtney P & Hone R (1993). Preoperative evaluation of cardiac failure and ischemia in elderly patients by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Chest 104, 701–704.

Ozcelik O, Ward SA & Whipp BJ (1999). Effect of body CO2 stores on pulmonary gas-exchange dynamics during incremental exercise. Exp Physiol 84, 999–1011.[Abstract]

Özyener F, Ward SA & Whipp BJ (2002). Influence of exercise intensity on the kinetics of pulmonary CO2 output. Proceedings of the Eur Sports Sci, p. 213.

Piiper J (1965). Physiological equilibria of the gas cavities of the body. In Handbook of Physiology, section 3, The Respiratory System, vol. II, ed. Fenn WO & Rahn H, pp. 1205–1218. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Rausch SM, Whipp BJ, Wasserman K & Huszczuk A (1991). Role of the carotid bodies in the respiratory compensation for the metabolic acidosis of exercise in humans. J Physiol 444, 567–578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scheuermann BW & Kowalchuk JM (1998). Attenuated respiratory compensation during rapidly incremented ramp exercise. Respir Physiol 114, 227–238.[CrossRef][Medline]

Steinhagen C, Hirche HJ, Nestle HW, Bovenkamp U & Hosselmann I (1976). The interstitial pH of the working gastrocnemius muscle of the dog. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol 367, 151–156.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stringer W & Wasserman K & Casaburi R (1995). The Formula relationship during heavy, constant work rate exercise reflects the rate of lactate accumulation. Eur J Appl Physiol 72, 25–31.

Sun XG, Hansen JE, Stringer WW, Ting H & Wasserman K (2001). Carbon dioxide pressure-concentration relationship in arterial and mixed venous blood during exercise. J Appl Physiol 90, 1798–1810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Visser BF, Kreukniet J & Maas AH (1964). Increase of whole blood lactic acid concentration during exercise as predicted from pH and Formula determinations. Pflugers Arch 281, 300–304.

Ward SA & Whipp BJ (1992). Influence of body CO2 stores on ventilatory-metabolic coupling during exercise. In Control of Breathing and its Modeling Perspective, ed. Honda Y, Miyamoto Y, Konno K & Widdicombe JG, pp. 425–431. Plenum Press, New York.

Wasserman K (1994). Coupling of external to cellular respiration during exercise: the wisdom of the body revisited. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 266, E519–E539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer W & Whipp BJ (2004). Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation, 4th edn. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.

Wasserman K, Stringer W, Casaburi R & Zhang YY (1997). Mechanism of exercise hyperkalemia: an alternate hypothesis. J Appl Physiol 83, 631–643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wasserman K, Whipp BJ, Koyal SN & Beaver WL (1973). The anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol 35, 236–242.[Free Full Text]

Whipp BJ, Davis JA & Wasserman K (1989). Ventilatory control of the ‘isocapnic buffering’ region in rapidly-incremental exercise. Resp Physiol 76, 357–368.[CrossRef][Medline]

Whipp BJ & Mahler M (1980). Dynamics of gas exchange during exercise. In Pulmonary Gas Exchange, vol. II, ed. West JB, pp. 33–96. Academic Press, New York.

Whipp BJ & Ward SA (1981). Control of ventilatory dynamics during exercise. Int J Sports Med 1, 146–159.

Whipp BJ & Ward SA (1991). The coupling of ventilation to pulmonary gas exchange during exercise. In Pulmonary Physiology and Pathophysiology of Exercise, ed. Whipp BJ & Wasserman K, pp. 271–307. Dekker, New York.

Whipp BJ, Ward SA & Wasserman K (1986). Respiratory markers of the anaerobic threshold. Adv Cardiol 35, 47–64.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
Corrigendum
Exp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 92(4): 781 - 781.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
S. A. Ward
Muscle-energetic and cardio-pulmonary determinants of exercise tolerance in humans: Muscle-energetic and cardio-pulmonary determinants of exercise tolerance in humans
Exp Physiol, March 1, 2007; 92(2): 321 - 322.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/2/347    most recent
expphysiol.2006.034363v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whipp, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whipp, B. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Symposia Papers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS