|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Veterinary Sciences Building, Brownlow Hill & Crown Street, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZJ, UK
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Received 21 February 2007;
accepted after revision 10 April 2007; first published online 27 April 2007)
Corresponding author R. Barrett-Jolley: Department of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Veterinary Sciences Building, Brownlow Hill & Crown Street, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZJ, UK. Email: rbj{at}liverpool.ac.uk
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SP itself is found at high levels within the PVN (Jessop et al. 1992), and an intrahypothalamic SP pathway projecting from the DMH to the PVN has been identified by means of immunohistochemistry (Bittencourt et al. 1991). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether this tachykinin DMH-to-PVN pathway is excitatory or inhibitory, and to identify the receptors involved.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pipettes were prepared with thick-walled borosilicate glass (Harvard GC150F). When filled, pipettes had resistances of approximately 10 M
. Data were recorded with an Axon Axopatch 200B amplifier and low-pass filtered at 5 kHz. Analysis was performed with the PC application, WCP (an analysis package written by John Dempster, Strathclyde University, UK).
Action current frequency measurement
The DMH was stimulated by Picospritzer application of glutamate. The puffer pipette was placed approximately 20 µm above the tissue and ejected glutamate against the flow of superfusing ACSF to prevent direct stimulation of the PVN. The experimental set-up is illustrated in Fig. 1. In control experiments, a green (triarylmethane-based) dye was included to further establish that there was no significant leakage of ejectant away from the DMH. Action currents were then recorded in PVN neurones by means of the cell-attached patch technique previously described (Fenwick et al. 1982; Zaki & Barrett-Jolley, 2002). Action current measurements were used to allow quantification of the underlying action potential frequency, without penetration of the cell or rupture of the cell membrane (Fenwick et al. 1982).
Statistics
Statistical testing was performed by StatsDirect (Stats Direct Ltd., Altringham, UK). The P values derive from a Kruskal–Wallis test, with a Conover–Inman multicomparison test unless otherwise stated. A P value of < 0.05 is defined as significant.
Solutions
The ACSF was composed of (mM): NaSO4, 65; NaCHO3, 26; NaCl, 25; glucose, 10; CaCl2, 4; KCl, 1.9; MgSO4, 1.3; and KH2PO4, 1.2; bubbled with 95% O2–5% CO2. The high-Mg2+ low-Ca2+ solution consisted of (mM): Na2SO4, 65; NaCHO3, 26; NaCl, 25; glucose, 10; CaCl2, 0.5; KCl, 1.9; MgSO4, 10; and KH2PO4, 1.2; bubbled with 95% O2–5% CO2. Pipette solution was (mM): KCl, 140; KOH, 10; Hepes, 10; EGTA, 5; and MgCl2, 1.4. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with KOH, throughout. With the exception of L-703606 (Tocris, Bristol, UK), a selective NK1 antagonist (Fong et al. 1992), all chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma, UK except for the triarylmethane-based dye (SuperCook, Sherburn-in-Elmet, UK).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We then investigated the tachykinin involvement in the DMH-to-PVN pathway specifically. Direct application of SP to the PVN significantly increased activity of five out of 14 neurones (2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison). In neurones where there was an increase, the mean frequency was increased from 3.2 ± 0.8 to 7.3 ± 1.2 Hz (n = 5, Fig. 3). Locations of reactive and non-reactive neurones to PVN-applied SP and DMH-applied glutamate are shown in Fig. 1. The selective NK1 antagonist L-703606 (1 µM) completely prevented this action (n = 9, Fig. 3). In further experiments, we found that bath application of L-703606 (1 µM) also completely inhibited the increase of PVN action current frequency resulting from glutamate stimulation of the DMH (glutamate alone, 10.7 ± 2.1 Hz; glutamate with L-703606, 1.7 ± 0.5 Hz, n = 5, P < 0.0005, Fig. 4).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The DMH-to-PVN pathway was blocked by non-specific excitatory amino acid (ionotopic) receptor inhibition with kynurenic acid. Glutamate clearly acted in (or very near to) the DMH, since: (i) it was applied very discretely by means of a Picospritzer; and (ii) these two nuclei lie approximately 1 mm apart and the physical cut we used to isolate the DMH from the PVN was within 100 µm of the DMH. In the most crucial experiments, we show that bath application of the specific NK1 receptor antagonist L-703606 eliminates the activation of PVN neurones resulting from glutamate application directly to the DMH. This inhibition was reversible and demonstrates the clear presence of an excitatory DMH-to-PVN tachykinin pathway. Furthermore, the activation could be mimicked by direct application of SP to the PVN. In previous experiments, we have shown both the presence of SP receptors and an excitatory SP response in the PVN (Barrett-Jolley, 2003; Womack & Barrett-Jolley, 2004) and so we suggest that tachykinin synapses are likely to be within the PVN itself.
There is strong evidence that the DMH-to-PVN pathway is important for physiological responses to stress (Dimicco et al. 1996; Stotz-Potter et al. 1996a; Morin et al. 2001), and certainly the PVN itself is important for control of both the ACTH (Swanson & Sawchenko, 1983) and the cardiovascular system (Coote, 2005). This pathway could then be important for either the cardiovascular or the neuroendocrine response to stress. Whilst there is evidence to suggest that the PVN is important for the cardiovascular response to stress (specifically, the defence reaction; Jansen et al. 1995; Duan et al. 1997), there is also evidence that the DMH-to-PVN pathway is more important for the corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) and ACTH responses to stress (air stress; Stotz-Potter et al. 1996a). Immunostaining for CRH is found widely in the PVN, both in parvocellular (Sawchenko & Swanson, 1985; Cai & Wise, 1996) and in magnocellular neurones (Sawchenko & Swanson, 1985); however, in the sagittal preparation used in this study we could not distinguish between these two PVN subpopulations (Fig. 1). It is likely that different stressors result in subtly different pathways and responses, since stress itself can only be loosely defined as a non-specific response of the body to any demand placed upon it (Seyle, 1956).
To conclude, the PVN is of profound importance to both sympathetic control and neuroendocrine regulation and we show here, for the first time, that the tachykininergic input from the DMH to the PVN is excitatory and mediated by SP acting at NK1 receptors.
|
|
|
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Barrett-Jolley R (2003). Substance P inhibits GABAA currents of paraventricular spinally projecting neurones. Br Neurosci Abstracts 17, P33.01.
Bittencourt JC, Benoit R & Sawchenko PE (1991). Distribution and origins of substance-P-immunoreactive projections to the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei – partial overlap with ascending catecholaminergic projections. J Chem Neuroanat 4, 63–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cai AH & Wise PM (1996). Age-related changes in the diurnal rhythm of CRH gene expression in the paraventricular nuclei. Am J Physiol 270, E238–E243.[Medline]
Chowdrey HS, Larsen PJ, Harbuz MS, Lightman SL & Jessop DS (1995). Endogenous substance-P inhibits the depression of corticotropin-releasing hormone during a chronic inflammatory stress. Life Sci 57, 2021–2029.[CrossRef][Medline]
Coote JH (2005). A role for the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus in the autonomic control of heart and kidney. Exp Physiol 90, 169–173.
Culman J, Itoi K & Unger T (1995). Hypothalamic tachykinins. Mediators of stress responses? Ann NY Acad Sci 771, 204–218.[CrossRef][Medline]
Culman J & Unger T (1995). Central tachykinins: mediators of defence reaction and stress reactions. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73, 885–891.[Medline]
DiMicco JA, Stotz-Potter EH, Monroe AJ & Morin SM (1996). Role of the dorsomedial hypothalamus in the cardiovascular response to stress. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 23, 171–176.[Medline]
Duan YF, Winters R, McCabe PM, Green EJ, Huang Y & Schneiderman N (1997). Cardiorespiratory components of defense reaction elicited from paraventricular nucleus. Physiol Behav 61, 325–330.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fenwick EM, Marty A & Neher E (1982). A patch-clamp study of bovine chromaffin cells and of their sensitivity to acetylcholine. J Physiol 331, 577–597.
Fong TM, Huang RR & Strader CD (1992). Localization of agonist and antagonist binding domains of the human neurokinin-1 receptor. J Biol Chem 267, 25664–25667.
Fontes MAP, Tagawa T, Polson JW, Cavanagh SJ & Dampney RAL (2001). Descending pathways mediating cardiovascular response from dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280, H2891–H2901.
Hwang BH, Katner J & Iyengar S (2005). Corticotropin releasing factor mRNA and substance P receptor binding in the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, central nucleus of the amygdala, and locus coeruleus of Sprague-Dawley rats following restraint-induced stress. J Mol Neurosci 25, 239–250.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jansen AS, Nguyen XV, Karpitskiy V, Mettenleiter TC & Loewy AD (1995). Central command neurons of the sympathetic nervous system: basis of the fight-or-flight response. Science 270, 644–646.
Jessop DS, Chowdrey HS, Larsen PJ & Lightman SL (1992). Substance P – multifunctional peptide in the hypothalamopituitary system. J Endocrinol 132, 331–337.[Medline]
Kannan H, Hayashida Y & Yamashita H (1989). Increase in sympathetic outflow by paraventricular nucleus stimulation in awake rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 256, R1325–R1330.
Kenney MJ, Weiss ML, Patel KP, Wang Y & Fels RJ (2001). Paraventricular nucleus bicuculline alters frequency components of sympathetic nerve discharge bursts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281, H1233–H1241.
Li YF & Patel KP (2003). Paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and elevated sympathetic activity in heart failure: the altered inhibitory mechanisms. Acta Physiol Scand 177, 17–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morin SM, Stotz-Potter EH & DiMicco JA (2001). Injection of muscimol in dorsomedial hypothalamus and stress-induced Fos expression in paraventricular nucleus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280, R1276–R1284.
Nakayama Y, Takano Y, Saito R & Kamiya H (1992). Central pressor actions of tachykinin NK-3 receptor in the paraventricular nucleus of the rat hypothalamus. Brain Res 595, 339–342.[CrossRef][Medline]
Paxinos G & Watson C (1986). The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 2nd edn. Academic Press Inc., London.
Samuels BC, Zaretsky DV & DiMicco JA (2002). Tachycardia evoked by disinhibition of the dorsomedial hypothalamus in rats is mediated through medullary raphe. J Physiol 538, 941–946.
Sawchenko PE & Swanson LW (1985). Localization, colocalization, and plasticity of corticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactivity in rat-brain. Fed Proc 44, 221–227.[Medline]
Seyle H (1956). The Stress of Life. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Siegel RA, Duker EM, Pahnke U & Wuttke W (1987). Stress-induced changes in cholecystokinin and substance P concentrations in discrete regions of the rat hypothalamus. Neuroendocrinology 46, 75–81.[Medline]
Spyer KM (1994). Annual review prize lecture. Central nervous mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular control. J Physiol 474, 1–19.
Stotz-Potter EH, Morin SM & DiMicco JA (1996a). Effect of microinjection of muscimol into the dorsomedial or paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus on air stress-induced neuroendocrine and cardiovascular changes in rats. Brain Res 742, 219–224.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stotz-Potter EH, Willis LR & DiMicco JA (1996b). Muscimol acts in dorsomedial but not paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus to suppress cardiovascular effects of stress. J Neurosci 16, 1173–1179.
Swanson LW & Sawchenko PE (1983). Hypothalamic integration – organization of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei. Ann Rev Neurosci 6, 269–324.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takano Y, Nakayama Y, Matsumoto T, Saito R & Kamiya H (1993). The mechanism of central pressor actions of tachykinin NK-3 receptor in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus in rats. Regul Pept 46, 360–363.[CrossRef][Medline]
Womack MD & Barrett-Jolley R (2004). Tachykinin receptor-mediated inhibition of GABAA currents in parvocellular neurones of the rat paraventricular nucleus. J Physiol 567.P, PC141.
Zaki A & Barrett-Jolley R (2002). Rapid neuromodulation by cortisol in the rat paraventricular nucleus: an in vitro study. Br J Pharmacol 137, 87–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang K, Li YF & Patel KP (2001). Blunted nitric oxide-mediated inhibition of renal nerve discharge within PVN of rats with heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281, H995–H1004.
Zhang K, Li YF & Patel KP (2002). Reduced endogenous GABA-mediated inhibition in the PVN on renal nerve discharge in rats with heart failure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282, R1006–R1015.
Zhang K, Mayhan WG & Patel KP (1997). Nitric oxide within the paraventricular nucleus mediates changes in renal sympathetic nerve activity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 42, R864–R872.
Zhang K & Patel KP (1998). Effect of nitric oxide within the paraventricular nucleus on renal sympathetic nerve discharge: role of GABA. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 44, R728–R734.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |