Experimental Physiology
	

Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 91.2 pp 457-464
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.032771
© The Physiological Society 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/457    most recent
expphysiol.2005.032771v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martel, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martel, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Muscle

Age and sex affect human muscle fibre adaptations to heavy-resistance strength training

Gregory F. Martel1,2, Stephen M. Roth2, Frederick M. Ivey2,3, Jeffrey T. Lemmer2,4, Brian L. Tracy2,5, Diane E. Hurlbut2, E. Jeffrey Metter6, Ben F. Hurley2 and Marc A. Rogers2

1 Department of Physical Therapy, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD, USA2 Department of Kinesiology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA3 Division of Gerontology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, and the Baltimore VA GRECC, Baltimore, MD, USA4 Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA5 Department of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA6 Clinical Research Branch, National Institute on Ageing, Baltimore, MD, USA

This study assessed age and sex effects on muscle fibre adaptations to heavy-resistance strength training (ST). Twenty-two young men and women (20–30 years old) and 18 older men and women (65–75 years old) completed 9 weeks of heavy-resistance knee extension exercises with the dominant leg 3 days week–1; the non-dominant leg served as a within-subject, untrained control. Bilateral vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were obtained before and after ST for analysis of type I, IIa and IIx muscle fibre cross-sectional area (CSA) and fibre type distribution. One-repetition maximum (1-RM) strength was also assessed before and after ST. ST resulted in increased CSA of type I, IIa and IIx muscle fibres in the trained leg of young men, type I and IIa fibres in young women, type IIa fibres in older men, and type IIx fibres in older women (all P < 0.05). Analysis of fibre type distribution revealed a significant increase in the percentage of type I fibres (P < 0.05) along with a decrease in type IIx fibres (P= 0.054) after ST only in young women. There were no significant changes in muscle fibre CSA or fibre type distribution in the untrained leg for any group. All groups displayed significant increases in 1-RM (27–39%; all P < 0.01). In summary, ST led to significant increases in 1-RM and type II fibre CSA in all groups; however, age and sex influence specific muscle fibre subtype responses to ST.

(Received 15 November 2005; accepted after revision 22 December 2005; first published online 11 January 2005)
Corresponding author G. F. Martel: Department of Physical Therapy, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA. Email: gfmartel{at}mail.umes.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
A M Solomon and P M G Bouloux
Modifying muscle mass - the endocrine perspective.
J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 191(2): 349 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the The Physiological Society.