Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Experimental Physiology 93.6 pp 754-762
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.041244
© The Physiological Society 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/754    most recent
expphysiol.2007.041244v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legerlotz, K.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, H. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legerlotz, K.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, H. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Muscle

Voluntary resistance running wheel activity pattern and skeletal muscle growth in rats

Kirsten Legerlotz1, Bradley Elliott1, Bernard Guillemin2 and Heather K. Smith1

Departments of 1 Sport and Exercise Science2 Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Auckland, New Zealand

The aims of this study were to characterize the pattern of voluntary activity of young rats in response to resistance loading on running wheels and to determine the effects of the activity on the growth of six limb skeletal muscles. Male Sprague–Dawley rats (4 weeks old) were housed individually with a resistance running wheel (R-RUN, n = 7) or a conventional free-spinning running wheel (F-RUN, n = 6) or without a wheel, as non-running control animals (CON, n = 6). The torque required to move the wheel in the R-RUN group was progressively increased, and the activity (velocity, distance and duration of each bout) of the two running wheel groups was recorded continuously for 45 days. The R-RUN group performed many more, shorter and faster bouts of running than the F-RUN group, yet the mean daily distance was not different between the F-RUN (1.3 ± 0.2 km) and R-RUN group (1.4 ± 0.6 km). Only the R-RUN resulted in a significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced muscle wet mass, relative to the increase in body mass, of the plantaris (23%) and vastus lateralis muscle (17%), and the plantaris muscle fibre cross-sectional area, compared with CON. Both F-RUN and R-RUN led to a significantly greater wet mass relative to increase in body mass and muscle fibre cross-sectional area in the soleus muscle compared with CON. We conclude that the pattern of voluntary activity on a resistance running wheel differs from that on a free-spinning running wheel and provides a suitable model to induce physiological muscle hypertrophy in rats.

(Received 25 November 2007; accepted after revision 11 February 2008; first published online 15 February 2008)
Corresponding author: H. K. Smith: Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. Email: h.smith{at}auckland.ac.nz







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the The Physiological Society.