Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on July 27, 2005.
Experimental Physiology (2005)
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.031435
© The Physiological Society 2005

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/6/815    most recent
expphysiol.2005.031435v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, W. A
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, O. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, W. A
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, O. B

Received June 23, 2005
Revised July 11, 2005
Accepted after revision July 19, 2005


Muscle physiology

BTS allows the recording of trains of intracellular action potentials from nerve stimulated intact fast-twitch skeletal muscle of the rat

William A Macdonald 1*, Thomas H Pedersen 2, Torben Clausen 2, Ole B Nielsen 2

1 University of Aarhus
2 University of Arahus

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wmd{at}fi.au.dk.


   Abstract
In skeletal muscle, the intracellular recording of trains of action potentials is difficult due to the movement of the muscle upon stimulation. A potential tool for the removal of muscle movement is the cross bridge cycle blocker, N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide (BTS), although the effects of BTS on the passive and active membrane properties of intact muscle fibres are not known. Rat extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle was used to show that 50 µM BTS reduced tetanic force to ~10 % of control force, without markedly altering muscle excitability. Incubation with BTS did not alter intracellular K+ content or Na+-K+ pump activity, but produced minor decreases in intracellular Na+ content (7 %), resting 22Na+-influx (14 %) and excitation-induced 22Na+-influx (29 %). Despite these alterations to Na+ fluxes, BTS did not impair muscle excitability, as membrane conductance, resting membrane potential (RMP), rheobase current and the amplitude, overshoot and maximum rate of depolarisation of the action potential were all unaltered. However, BTS did induce a small (8 %) decrease in the maximum rate of depolarisation of the action potential and an increase in the refractory period. The minor effects of BTS on muscle membrane properties did not compromise the ability of the muscle to propagate action potentials, even during tetanic stimulation. In conclusion, BTS can be successfully used to reduce contractility, allowing the intracellular recording of action potentials during both twitch and tetanic contraction of nerve stimulated muscle, thus making it an excellent tool for the study of electrophysiology in fast-twitch skeletal muscle.

Key Words: Action potential, Electrophysiology, Skeletal muscle







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the The Physiological Society.