Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on September 22, 2005.
Experimental Physiology (2005)
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.031799
© The Physiological Society 2005

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/1/149    most recent
expphysiol.2005.031799v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pusch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Babini, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pusch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Babini, E.

Received September 9, 2005
Revised September 19, 2005
Accepted after revision September 20, 2005


Genomic physiology

Channel or transporter? The CLC saga continues

Michael Pusch 1*, Giovanni Zifarelli 1, Anna Rosa Murgia 1, Alessandra Picollo 1, Elena Babini 1

1 CNR

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pusch{at}ge.ibf.cnr.it.


   Abstract
It was recently shown that the putative bacterial Cl- channel, ClC-ec1, is in reality a Cl-/H+ antiporter. Our group has now shown that this is also the case for two human CLC's, ClC-4 and ClC-5. We found that the flux of Cl- in one direction is stoichiometrically coupled to the movement of protons in the opposite direction unveiling a behavior that is typical of a transporter rather than a channel. This discovery will surely stimulate further research to elucidate the molecular elements responsible for the behavior as a transporter. On the physiological level the antiport activity of ClC-4/ClC-5 must lead to a review of the role of CLC-proteins in intracellular compartments. Small organic molecules have been extremely useful tools for studying ion channels and many commercial drugs target specific ion channel proteins. Several blockers have been found to inhibit plasma membrane localized CLC channels ClC-0, ClC-1, and ClC-Ka. These compounds include 9-anthracene-carboxylic acid (9-AC), p-chlorophenoxy-propionic acid (CPP) and its derivatives, and 4,4'-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS). Two different binding sites have been identified, one extracellular and one intracellular. However, high affinity ligands for most CLC proteins are still missing. Apart from being useful biophysical tools such drugs may provide a way to modulate protein function in vivo. With these tasks to be accomplished, it is definitely an exciting time in the chloride transport field.

Key Words: Chloride channel, Ion transport, pH







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the The Physiological Society.