Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on September 14, 2006.
Experimental Physiology (2006)
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.034934
© The Physiological Society 2006

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/1/187    most recent
expphysiol.2006.034934v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mundel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mundel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. A

Received June 29, 2006
Revised July 26, 2006
Accepted after revision September 12, 2006


Human, Environmental & Exercise [250]

The Effects of Face-Cooling during Hyperthermic Exercise: Evidence for an Integrated Thermal, Neuroendocrine and Behavioural Response

Toby Mundel 1*, Sabrina J Bunn 1, Paula L Hooper 1, David A Jones 2

1 The University of Birmingham
2 The University of Birmingham, Manchester Metropolitan University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: t.mundel{at}bham.ac.uk.


   Abstract
The present study investigated whether face-cooling reduced both the perceived exertion (RPE) and prolactin (PRL) release during hyperthermic exercise. Ten, non heat-acclimated males (23 ± 2 years; VO2max: 56 ± 7 ml kg-1 min-1 [mean ± SD]) exercised for 40 min on a cycle ergometer at 65% of their peak aerobic power, at an ambient temperature of 33°C (27% relative humidity) with (FC) and without face-cooling as a control (CON). With FC, forehead temperature was maintained ~6°C lower than CON while other skin sites were similar or slightly warmer in the FC condition. Rectal temperature increased by ~1.5°C with the same time course in both conditions. A relative bradycardia was observed during FC, with heart rate approximately 5 beats min-1 lower than CON (p < 0.05). Mean plasma lactate was lower during FC (FC: 5.0 ± 0.3, CON: 5.9 ± 0.3 mmol l-1; p < 0.05) but no differences were observed for plasma glucose which remained constant during exercise. Levels of PRL were maintained at 175 ± 17 miU l-1 during exercise for FC while values for CON increased to a peak of 373 ± 22 miU l-1 so that towards the end of the exercise, for the same rectal temperature, PRL was significantly lower in the FC condition (p < 0.05). Global and breathing RPE were reduced but only towards the end of the 40 min of exercise during FC, whilst subjective thermal comfort was significantly lower during FC (p < 0.05). We confirm the substantial effect that FC has on the secretion of PRL during hyperthermic exercise but show that it makes a relatively small contribution to the perception of effort when compared to the effect of a cool total skin area as occurs with exercise in a thermo-neutral environment.

Key Words: Exercise, Hyperthermia, Prolactin




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. L. J. Wijers, W. H. M. Saris, and W. D. van Marken Lichtenbelt
Individual Thermogenic Responses to Mild Cold and Overfeeding Are Closely Related
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4299 - 4305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the The Physiological Society.