Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on October 19, 2007.
Experimental Physiology (2007)
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.039677
© The Physiological Society 2007

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/2/288    most recent
expphysiol.2007.039677v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doherty, L. S
Right arrow Articles by McNicholas, W. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doherty, L. S
Right arrow Articles by McNicholas, W. T

Received July 25, 2007
Revised August 31, 2007
Accepted after revision October 12, 2007


Respiratory [290]

The genioglossus response to negative airway pressure: stimulus timing and route of delivery

Liam S Doherty 1*, John P Cullen 1, Phillip Nolan 2, Walter T McNicholas 1

1 St.Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin
2 University College Dublin

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lsdoherty1{at}hotmail.com.


   Abstract
The genioglossus reflex response to sudden onset pulses of negative airway pressure (NAP) in humans is reported to occur more commonly at end rather than onset of expiration when delivered via mouthpiece. We examined whether this response was modulated by route of stimulus delivery throughout the respiratory cycle. The genioglossus surface EMG (GGsEMG) response to NAP delivered randomly throughout the respiratory cycle was measured in two experiments; (i) 40 stimuli of NAP at -5, -7.5 and -10 cmH2O applied to 8 healthy, awake, supine males via nose mask, (ii) 60 stimuli of -7.5 H2O NAP applied to 15 subjects via both nose-mask mask and mouthpiece in random order. Despite similar pressure changes detected in the epiglottis during both routes of stimulus delivery, far lower pressure changes were measured at the nasal choanae during mouthpiece compared to nose-mask delivery. There were no significant differences between the responses during any phase of respiration, nor when NAP was delivered via nasal-mask or mouthpiece. We conclude that the sensitivity of the GG sEMG response to NAP in humans does not vary significantly with phase of respiration or route of breathing.

Key Words: EMG, Muscle contraction, Reflex







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the The Physiological Society.