Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on November 26, 2007.
Experimental Physiology (2007)
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.040741
© The Physiological Society 2007

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/3/391    most recent
expphysiol.2007.040741v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, T. J
Right arrow Articles by Proske, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, T. J
Right arrow Articles by Proske, U.

Received September 17, 2007
Revised October 22, 2007
Accepted after revision November 19, 2007


Human, Environmental & Exercise [250]

Evidence from proprioception of fusimotor co-activation during voluntary contractions

Trevor J Allen 1, Gabrielle E Ansems 1, Uwe Proske 1*

1 Monash University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: uwe.proske{at}med.monash.edu.au.


   Abstract
In experiments on position sense at the elbow joint in the horizontal plane, blindfolded subjects were required to match the position of one forearm (reference) by placement of their other arm (indicator). Position errors were measured after conditioning elbow muscles of the reference arm with an isometric contraction while the arm was held either flexed or extended. The difference in errors after the two forms of conditioning was large when the conditioned muscles remained relaxed during the matching process and it became less when elbow muscles were required to lift a load during the match (10% and 25% of maximum voluntary contraction). Errors from muscle conditioning were attributed to signals arising in muscle spindles and were hypothesized to result from the thixotropic property of passive intrafusal fibres. Active muscle does not exhibit thixotropy. It is proposed that during a voluntary contraction the errors after conditioning are less, because the spindles become co-activated through the fusimotor system. The distribution of errors is therefore seen to be a reflection of fusimotor recruitment thresholds. For elbow flexors most, but not all, fusimotor fibres appear to be recruited by 10% of maximum of the contraction.

Key Words: Mechanoreceptor, Muscle contraction, Proprioception







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the The Physiological Society.