Experimental Physiology
	

Celebrating 100 years
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on February 22, 2008.
Experimental Physiology (2008)
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.041764
© The Physiological Society 2008

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/7/843    most recent
expphysiol.2007.041764v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wust, R. C.I.
Right arrow Articles by Degens, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wust, R. C.I.
Right arrow Articles by Degens, H.

Received December 18, 2007
Revised January 4, 2008
Accepted after revision February 22, 2008


Muscle [260]

Sex differences in contractile properties and fatigue resistance of human skeletal muscle

Rob C.I. Wust 1*, Chris I. Morse 2, Arnold de Haan 3, David A. Jones 4, Hans Degens 1

1 IRM, MMU
2 IRM, MMU
3 Vrije University Amsterdam
4 University of Birmingham and IRM, MMU

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.wust{at}mmu.ac.uk.


   Abstract
To explore the cause of higher skeletal muscle fatigue resistance in women than men, we used electrically evoked contractions (1-s on 1-s off, 30 Hz, 2 min), which circumvents motivational bias and allows examination of contractile properties. We compared 29 men (26.5 (7.0) yr) (mean (SD)) with 35 women (25.4 (7.6) yr). Strength of the quadriceps muscle was higher in men than women (P<0.001). The lower maximal rate of relaxation in women (P=0.002) indicates that their muscles were slower than those of men. The torque declined less in women than in men (37.7 (10.7)% vs. 29.9 (10.0)%; P=0.002), and was not related to muscle strength or size, as determined with MRI. The sex-difference in fatigability was also seen when the circulation to the leg was occluded (torque declined 76.9 (10.8) vs. 59.5 (16.9)% in men vs. women respectively; P=0.008). The maximal rate of relaxation correlated with the fatigability of the muscle under all conditions (correlations ranging from 0.34 to 0.51, P<0.02). We conclude that the sex-related difference in skeletal muscle fatigue resistance is not explicable by differences in motivation, muscle size, oxidative capacity and/or blood flow between sexes, but might be related to differences in fiber type composition.

Key Words: Electrical stimulation, Ischaemia, Muscle fatigue







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the The Physiological Society.